Numerical solution of Schrodinger equation

arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Suppose for some specific problem (symmetric potential well) the Schroedinger equation is expected to give certain discrete bound states and corresponding eigenfunctions. Now I am trying to obtain the eigenfunctions by numerically solving the equation and plotting the solutions by randomly assigning energy value. In general most of the times my guess of energy value will be wrong but the program (say Mathematica) will give some result (plot for the wave function). What will be interpretation for those results?

The answer may be those are simply wrong eigenfunctions so no interpretation is needed. However I was doing this stupid job and was getting divergent wave functions almost always. But I do not understand why Mathematica was giving divergent plot rather than some arbitrary finite plot. Do you have any clue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a solution (actually, two linearly independent solutions) of the time-indpendent Schrodinger equation in one dimension for every value of the energy. For bound states, these are only allowed if they are normalizable, and this only happens for certain precise values of the energy (and these are the energy eigenvalues).
 
arroy_0205 said:
Suppose for some specific problem (symmetric potential well) the Schroedinger equation is expected to give certain discrete bound states and corresponding eigenfunctions. Now I am trying to obtain the eigenfunctions by numerically solving the equation and plotting the solutions by randomly assigning energy value. In general most of the times my guess of energy value will be wrong but the program (say Mathematica) will give some result (plot for the wave function). What will be interpretation for those results?

The answer may be those are simply wrong eigenfunctions so no interpretation is needed. However I was doing this stupid job and was getting divergent wave functions almost always. But I do not understand why Mathematica was giving divergent plot rather than some arbitrary finite plot. Do you have any clue?

I don't really understand what you are trying to ask. Have you written a program to calculate the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions or are you using someone else's program? The normal technique for numerically solving the 1-D Schrodinger Equation is the Numerov method, is your algorithm based on that technique? If not, you might want to google 'Numerov method' and look at the theory behind the method and maybe even some sample code and check it against your algorithm.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top