Numerically integrating the Planck distribution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
heafnerj
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a project that requires me to numerically integrate the Planck spectral distribution. The object is to find the median wavelength, with exactly 50% of the radiance on either side. I'm using a standard composite Simpson rule method and I get good convergence with temps around 5000K. For temps at and above 7000K, I can't get convergence. Is there a better scheme to use for this application?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hurkyl said:
How familiar are you with issue of numeric stability? Have you analyzed the error term for Simpson's rule?

Rudimentary. No.
 
Sometimes the simplest methods are the best when you are trying to solve numerical problems. When I am integrating something that I suspect might "misbehave" I always use methods based on polynomials of order 1; e.g. the trapezoidal rule with very small intervals.
This is very inefficient but it always works; and unless you need to integrate thousands of equations you will rarely notice the difference on a modern computer.

Of course you can always try to use e.g. the composite Simpson's rule; it should be better than the "plain" Simpson's rule for your problem.