Numerically simulating stellar pulsation using a "one zone" model

patrykh18
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Write a code that will simulate stellar pulsation using a "one zone" model, and plot various graphs
Relevant Equations
The relevant equations are given in the image attached
The question is taken from An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics by Carroll and Ostlie. I did manage to do the entire question and plot the relevant graphs but I just want to to investigate a bit more. For example I want to look at how the graph would like in the case of the Sun. I don't know what the right value for pressure I would need to input in order to get the right graph, with the right amplitude and period. The value for P in part d of the question seems arbitrary to me.

1581789114981.png


1581789160000.png
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help would be appreciated. Question: Consider a gaseous sphere in hydrostatic equilibrium. Assume that the gas is ideal, with no magnetic field and that the equation of state is given by P = Kρ^γ, where γ is a constant.(a) Derive an expression for the density as a function of radius.(b) Assume that the density at the center of the sphere is ρ_c and that the sound speed is given by c_s = (γP/ρ)^1/2. Obtain an expression for the frequency of radial pulsations of the sphere.(c) Show that for small amplitudes, the frequency is independent of the amplitude.(d) Assuming that P = P_0 cos (ωt), plot the behavior of the density as a function of r for two different values of ω.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top