Object and Friction on the object

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dexter90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of friction and forces acting on an object, particularly in the context of Newton's second law of motion. Participants explore the relationships between mass, acceleration, friction, and air resistance, with a focus on the relevant formulas and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for friction, T=μ·N, and questions whether the mass (m) in the equation F=m·a represents the mass of the object.
  • Another participant clarifies that typically, one object has one normal force (N) and one friction force (μN) with a surface, suggesting that the equation should be T - μmg = ma.
  • A participant proposes that if multiple forces act on an object, the effective acceleration can be expressed as a=g·μ + λ, where λ represents air resistance.
  • Another participant challenges this by stating that air resistance is not proportional to mass but depends on cross-sectional area and speed, suggesting a different formulation involving drag.
  • There is a discussion about the direction of forces, with one participant asking if the negative sign in -ma indicates that air resistance acts in the opposite direction to motion.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the addition of forces and how they interact in the context of the equations presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct formulation of the equations involving friction and air resistance. There are competing views on how to account for these forces and their effects on motion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential misunderstanding of the relationships between forces, mass, and acceleration, as well as the specific conditions under which the equations apply. The discussion highlights the complexity of incorporating multiple forces acting on an object.

dexter90
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Good Morning

I am new user on Forum and I'm sorry for all mistake. I am living in Poland and My English is on the low level.

My question concers friction on the objects. We have formula:

[tex]T=μ \cdot N[/tex], where

[tex]μ[/tex] - coefficient on fraction
[tex]N=m\cdot g[/tex]

and formula:

[tex]F=m\cdot a[/tex]

I think that:

[tex]F=T \Rightarrow m\cdot a=μ \cdot m\cdot g[/tex]

This is true?? Coefficient [tex]m[/tex] is mass object?? If on the object interacts more physical force ( example Friction's ) = [tex]m \cdot a=m\cdot μ\cdot (N_{1}+N_{2}+...+N_{n})[/tex]??

I greet
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

good morning, dexter90! welcome to pf! :smile:

dexter90 said:
I think that: [itex]F=T \Rightarrow m\cdot a=μ \cdot m\cdot g[/itex]

This is true?? Coefficient [itex]m[/itex] is mass object?? If on the object interacts more physical force ( example Friction's ) = [itex]m \cdot a=m\cdot μ\cdot (N_{1}+N_{2}+...+N_{n})[/itex]??

(btw, we usually write "T" only for "tension" :wink:)

one object only has one normal force (N), and one friction force (µN) with a particular surface

for example, if a rope with tension T is pulling an object with mass m along a horizontal surface, then the F = ma equation is:

T - µmg = ma :wink:

(your equation ma = µmg is impossible … if the only force is friction, then the object won't move!)
 
Thanks you for quickly answer.

I understand, one object -> one force ( friction on the surface ). Friction is force which retard object. If on the object interacts more force's then coefficient retard is bigger, example: air resistance, then We have from formula:

[tex]m\cdot a=m\cdot g\cdot μ[/tex], next

[tex]a=g\cdot μ + \lambda[/tex], where:

[tex]\lambda[/tex] - coefficient air resistance in [N].

Yes?

I greet.
 
hi dexter90! :smile:
dexter90 said:
… If on the object interacts more force's then coefficient retard is bigger, example: air resistance, then We have from formula:

[tex]m\cdot a=m\cdot g\cdot μ[/tex], next

[tex]a=g\cdot μ + \lambda[/tex], where:

[tex]\lambda[/tex] - coefficient air resistance in [N].

Yes?

not exactly …

air resistance is not proportional to mass (it's proportional to cross-section area, and it also depends on speed, but not mass, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_equation),

so the equation will be something like -ma = µmg + kAv2,

or a = -(µg + kAv2/m) :wink:
 
:)

I have a question to this formula:

[tex]-ma...[/tex]

Not exist [tex]-[/tex] in [tex]ma=μmg[/tex]. Now, it is present because force air resistance is returned in the opposite direction??

I apologize for the grammar :)
 
Last edited:
both the friction and the air resistance are retarding forces (they both reduce the acceleration of a moving object)

so it should have been -ma = µmg
 
Ok.

I can add forces in the same way??
 
what do you mean? :confused:
 
Ok.

I understand all, thanks you.

I greet! :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K