Object at focal point of converging lense

AI Thread Summary
When an object is positioned at the focal point of a converging lens, the light rays emanating from it become parallel to the principal axis after refraction. This parallel alignment means the rays do not converge, creating the effect of an image located at infinity. Ray diagrams can illustrate this by depicting three specific rays: one parallel to the axis, one through the lens center, and one through the focal point on the opposite side. These rays demonstrate that while they appear to diverge infinitely, they do not converge at a finite point. Thus, the image formed appears to be at an infinite distance.
admajoremdeigloriam
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question that I can't seem to answer...

why is it that when an object is at the focal point of a converging lense, the image is at infinity? How can you show this through ray diagrams?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
admajoremdeigloriam said:
I have a simple question that I can't seem to answer...

why is it that when an object is at the focal point of a converging lense, the image is at infinity? How can you show this through ray diagrams?

The lens equation:

\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{i} + \frac{1}{o}

What is the object distance if i = f? Or, what is the image distance if o = infinity?

AM
 


When an object is placed at the focal point of a converging lens, the rays of light coming from that object will be parallel to the principal axis of the lens. This means that the refracted rays will also be parallel to the principal axis, and will not converge or diverge. As a result, the image formed by these refracted rays will appear to be at an infinite distance, or at infinity.

To demonstrate this through ray diagrams, we can draw three rays of light coming from the object towards the lens. The first ray will be drawn parallel to the principal axis and will pass through the focal point of the lens. The second ray will pass through the center of the lens and will not be refracted. The third ray will pass through the focal point on the other side of the lens and will emerge parallel to the principal axis.

These three rays will converge at a point on the other side of the lens, forming the image of the object. However, since the refracted rays are parallel to the principal axis, they will never actually meet at a point, giving the illusion that the image is at an infinite distance.

In summary, when an object is placed at the focal point of a converging lens, the refracted rays will be parallel to the principal axis, resulting in an image at infinity. This can be shown through ray diagrams by drawing three rays and observing how they behave after passing through the lens.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top