Observing wavelength at an angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Wavelength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation for observing wavelength at an angle, specifically ## \lambda_{ob} = \frac{\lambda}{cos(\alpha)} ##, where ##\alpha## is the angle of observation relative to the wave's direction. Observers perpendicular to the wavefront perceive the same phase across their observation plane, leading to confusion about the concept of wavelength in this context. The distance between maxima appears infinite because all points in the observation plane show the same maximum simultaneously, while the actual wavelength remains unchanged in the direction of wave propagation. Clarification arises from visualizing the wave as stationary and the observer moving towards it at an angle. This perspective aids in understanding the relationship between observed and real wavelengths.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I recently came across an equation stating that ## \lambda_{ob} = \frac{\lambda}{cos(\alpha)} ## if ##\alpha## is the angle the observer is relative to the wave's direction of propagation. I guess I can kind of understand that a person perpendicular (i.e. ##\alpha = 1##) would see the normal wavelength, but am just failing to understand what exactly it even means to observe the wavelength at an angle. How does standing perpendicular to the wavefront make it look like the wave has an infinite wavelength?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does not, but if you look at the phase difference between different points of your "observation plane", they all have the same phase. This equation tells you how far apart maxima (or specific phases) are on your observation plane. I don't think it is useful to call this "wavelength", however.
 
mfb said:
It does not, but if you look at the phase difference between different points of your "observation plane", they all have the same phase. This equation tells you how far apart maxima (or specific phases) are on your observation plane. I don't think it is useful to call this "wavelength", however.

Hmmm...do you mind expanding on that? How exactly does the maxima look infinitely far away from each other if you're simply looking at the wave perpendicular to its direction of propagation?

Also, isn't the distance separating maxima essentially what an observed wavelength is?
 
The distance along the observation plane is "infinite" (you see the same maximum everywhere at the same time). The distance along the travel direction (the real wavelength) does not change.
 
mfb said:
The distance along the observation plane is "infinite" (you see the same maximum everywhere at the same time). The distance along the travel direction (the real wavelength) does not change.

Thinking of the wave as stationary and myself moving against the wavefront at the angle ##\alpha## really helped! Thank you!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top