I Obtain simultaneous eigenfunctions?

John Greger
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Let's consider two observables, H (hamiltonian) and P (momentum).

These operators are compatible since [H,P] = 0.

Let's look at the easy to prove rule:
1: "If the observables F and G are compatible, that is, if there exists a simultaneous set of eigenfunctions of the operators F and G, then these operators must commute; [F , G] = 0."

This can be turned around to yield,
2: " If the operators F and G commute, then it is possible to find a simultaneous set of eigenfunctions."

How would the simultaneous eigenfunctions look like for H and P? Would it be something on matrix form?

Or is the following functions simply the "simultaneous eigenfunctions":

$$\hat{H} u_{n,m}(x) = E_n u_{n,m}(x)$$
$$\hat{P} u_{n,m}(x) = P_m u_{n,m}(x)$$

where ## \psi(x) = \Sigma_{n,m} C_{n,m} u_{n,m}(x)## ?

And I think the spectrum cannot be continuous right...

EDIT: How would I express a generic wave function as a superposition of the above eigenstates if they are "equivalent"?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a 1d free particle, the eigenfunctions of ##\hat{p}## are like ##Ae^{ikx}## with ##A## and ##k## some real-valued constants. These are all eigenfunctions of ##\hat{H}##. The set of eigenfunctions of ##\hat{H}## also contains functions like ##Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}## which are not eigenfunctions of ##\hat{p}## because the sign of the 1d momentum is uncertain.

If you have a Hamiltonian operator that also depends on position ##\hat{x}## , then the ##\hat{H}## and ##\hat{p}## will not commute.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top