Obtaining Acceleration from Position vs Time graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing a car's acceleration using a Position vs Time graph. The user graphed the data and calculated tangential slopes to derive velocity, but found discrepancies between the slopes obtained from tangents and those from linearization. The equations provided indicate that the velocity derived from tangents is approximately double that from linearization, which raises confusion regarding the expected relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration. It is clarified that velocity is the derivative of position, and acceleration is the derivative of velocity, suggesting that the differing multipliers for time in the equations account for the observed differences. Ultimately, the user is left questioning whether the acceleration should be 9.188 or 18.7798, highlighting the complexity of the relationships in kinematics.
aleronLolli
I have collected data on a car accelerating down a straight track. I graphed it Position vs Time. Then I found the tangent slope at 5 points along the curve and plotted them as velocity. But then I linearized the position vs Time graph (position vs Time^2.) However, the slope of the velocity vs Time graph i got from taking the slope of the tangents was about double of what I got from linearization. This doesn't make sense to me...

Equations:
Position vs Time:
x = 9.396x^2-1.188x+6.014
Velocity vs Time: (from tangent slopes)
18.7798
Position vs Time^2: (from linearization)
9.188
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both of those results are reasonably close to what they should be. If position = 9.396*time^2-1.188*time+6.014, then velocity = 2*9.396*time-1.188. Remember that the position at a later time (when the velocity is high) has the accumulated effect of all the proceeding time (when velocity was low). So you should not expect the same multipliers. Velocity's multiplier of time should be twice as high as position's multiplier of time.

Velocity is the derivative of position.
 
So what would the acceleration of the car be? 9.188 or 18.7798?
 
Is this a homework problem? If so, there is a format for those questions and I will not help more except to say that acceleration is the derivative of velocity.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
963
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top