Obtaining position in a dipole field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the location of a magnet vector within a magnetic dipole field, represented by a complex equation. It is noted that the magnetic field is uniform along a circular ring coaxial with the dipole, making it impossible to uniquely identify the source location from a given magnetic field vector. The problem is further complicated by the fact that the field strength depends on both the dipole strength and distance, which are not provided. Additionally, the magnetic field vector's azimuthal symmetry indicates that while the magnitude is constant along the ring, the vector direction varies. Ultimately, the consensus is that without additional information, pinpointing the exact location of the magnet vector in the dipole field is not feasible.
IanBerkman
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

Consider one has a magnetic dipole, the field given by:

\begin{equation}
\vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\left(\frac{3(\vec{m}\cdot\vec{r})\vec{r}}{r^5}-\frac{\vec{m}}{r^3}\right)
\end{equation}

where we can take $$\vec{m} = m\hat{y}$$.

Let us say we have the a magnet vector which is theoretically somewhere in the dipole field. Is it possible to obtain the location where that magnet vector occurs?

To simplify things a bit, I looked at the fieldlines of a dipole, sliced through the XY plane:

220px-Magnetic_dipole_moment.jpg


If we have a magnet vector of B = a[1,1,0], the vector would lie somewhere along the line y = 2x (just a really rough approximation to get my point across). The magnitude of the vector should correspond to two points on this line due to the symmetry. However, the dipole equation becomes

\begin{equation}
a[1,1,0]^\intercal = \frac{\mu_0m}{4\pi}\left(\frac{3y\vec{r}}{r^5}-\frac{\hat{y}}{r^3}\right)
\end{equation}

Which remains quite a tough equation to solve.

What am I missing in my line of reasoning?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
IanBerkman said:
Let us say we have the a magnet vector which is theoretically somewhere in the dipole field. Is it possible to obtain the location where that magnet vector occurs?
I'm not sure if I understand your question. Are you asking that when given ##\mathbf{B}## at some location in space, if it is possible to determine the source location?

If that is your question then the answer is no. This is because for a simple magnetic dipole, the magnetic field will be uniform along a circular ring coaxial with the dipole. The problem is also under constrained considering that the field strength is a function of the dipole strength and the distance; you have neither.
 
NFuller said:
I'm not sure if I understand your question. Are you asking that when given ##\mathbf{B}## at some location in space, if it is possible to determine the source location?

If that is your question then the answer is no. This is because for a simple magnetic dipole, the magnetic field will be uniform along a circular ring coaxial with the dipole. The problem is also under constrained considering that the field strength is a function of the dipole strength and the distance; you have neither.

The magnetic field magnitude would be uniform along the circular ring coaxial with the dipole. However, the magnetic field vectors would be different along the ring.

Let us consider the same magnetic dipole again in the y-direction, and we know the field at a certain position is of the form B=[1,1,0]. Since this field has no z-component, the answer should lie in the XY-plane instead of on a circular ring.

The dipole strength is known since m is given.
 
IanBerkman said:
However, the magnetic field vectors would be different along the ring.
The magnetic field of a dipole ##\mathbf{m}=m\hat{\mathbf{z}}## in spherical coordinates is
$$\mathbf{B}=\frac{\mu_{0}m}{4\pi r^{3}}\left(2\text{cos}(\theta)\hat{\mathbf{r}}+\text{sin}(\theta)\hat{\mathbf{\theta}}\right)$$
Notice that there is no ##\phi## dependence here so the magnetic field has azimuthal symmetry. Thus ##\mathbf{B}## is constant along a ring coaxial with the z-axis.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top