Obtaining the angular momentum state of two spin 1/2 particles for (S=0)

slimjim
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



consider the possible angular momentum states |s,m>, of a system of two spin-1/2 particles

construct all possible states with total spin zero (S=0)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



if total S of system is zero, m must also equal zero. So the only state is |s=0,m=0>

and |s=0,m=0> = 1/sqrt(2)[ up*down - down*up ]

I got the exact form of |0,0> from my textbook, but I don't understand how this particular combination of up/down states is acquired.

considering the state |s=1,m=1>, its intuitive that m can only equal 1 if both spins are +1/2. The same goes for |s=1,m=-1> where both spins are -1/2.

Then one can obtain |s=1,m=0> by applying the lowering operator to yield:

|s=1,m=0> = 1/sqrt(2)[up*down+down*up)

my book gives a thorough explanation i deriving the s=1 states, but then it just gives the S=0 state without much explanation.

so how do you obtain |s=0,m=0> = 1/sqrt(2)[ up*down - down*up ] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Can you show that the state |s = 0, m = 0> must be orthogonal to |s = 1, m = 0>?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top