Odd Mode Analysis: Microwave Transmission Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of ABCD parameters for shunt stubs versus a 1/4λ transmission line. It highlights that shunt stubs can be treated as lumped elements with parameters A=1, B=0, C=Y, D=1, while the 1/4λ line is treated as a transmission line with different parameters. The key distinction is that series and shunt stubs can be represented as lumped elements, whereas the 1/4λ line must be analyzed as a transmission line. The participant expresses initial confusion but ultimately clarifies their understanding of the concepts. This analysis underscores the importance of recognizing the different representations of transmission line components in circuit theory.
sandy.bridge
Messages
797
Reaction score
1
Hey all,

Refer to page 5 in the pdf in the link (http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee481/notes/481Lecture26.pdf)

I am having a little bit of a hard time understanding a portion of a derivation. You will notice that when determining the ABCD paramters of the shunt stubs they merely use A=1, B=0, C=Y, D=1. However, they do not use A=1, B=Z, C=0, D=1 for the 1/4λ transmission line (which would be used to describe a series impedance). Why can they treat the stubs as an impedance when determining the ABCD parameters, but the 1/4λ wave section has to be treated as transmission line? They are both sections of transmission line, but the stub can be treated as a lumped element?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
To be honest, I think I figured it out. Not entirely sure why my brain was not functioning properly when I was analyzing this. Series and shunt stubs can be represented as lumped elements. The two stubs are shunt to the 1/4 wave tranmission line, and hence can be represented as lumped elements shunt to the 1/4 wave transmission line.

My apologies!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top