Odd-Numbered Arithmetic Progressions: A Different Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kartik.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
Kartik.
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
"If we have to take three terms in an AP, it is convenient ti take them as a-d,a,a+d. In general, we take a-rd,a-(r-1)d,...,a-d,a,a+d, in case we have to take (2r+1) terms in an AP."

What do they mean by the portion in bold?
What is 'r' here ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
r is an integer related to the total number of terms in the sequence (2r+1). I am not aware of the context.

The author (for some reason) is counting an arithmetic progression with an odd number of terms by starting in the middle and counting r terms in each direction. I have no idea what the point is. Usually a discussion of AP will start with the first term, while the number of terms may be odd or even.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top