ODE particular solution of the homogeneous equation

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
y''(t)+A^2y(t)=f(t), t>0, y(0)=B, y'(0)=C, A, B, C\in\mathbb{R}

e^{iAt} is a particular solution of the homogeneous equation. I can multiply it by some arbitrary function and find another solution of the homogeneous case, but when I try with the f(t) on the RHS, I can't do it. Anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not at all sure what you mean by "I can multiply it by some arbitrary function and find another solution of the homogeneous case" Since the two solutions to the characteristic equation for this problem are Ai and -Ai, the two independent solutions to the homogeneous equation are
e^{iAt} and e^{-iAt}. What do you mean by "try with the f(t) on the RHS"? Are you talking about "variation of parameters"?
 
I meant by reduction of order.
 
Ah! Then you are not multiplying by "some arbitrary function". You are multiplying by an unknown function and then determining what that function must be in order to solve the equation.

Since you know that e^{iAt} satisfies the homogenous equation, you look for a solution to the entire equation of the form [itex\y= u(t)e^{iAt}[/itex]. Then y'= u'e^{iAt}+ iAu e^{iAt} and y"= u"e^{iAt}+ 2iAu'e^{iAt}- A^2ue^{iAt}. Putting those into the original equation, the A^2ue^{iAt} terms cancel leaving u"e^{iAt}+ 2iAu'e^{iAt}= f(t). Since there are only first and second derivatives of u in that, let v= u' and the differential equation reduces to first order: v'e^{iAt}+ 2iAve^{iAt}= f(t) or v'+ 2iAv= f(t)e^{-iAt}
That's a linear first order differential equation so there is a formula for the integrating factor.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top