News Ohio Voting Macines In The News Again

  • Thread starter Thread starter edward
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News Voting
AI Thread Summary
Ohio's voting machine systems have been found to be vulnerable to manipulation, as revealed in an 86-page report by Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner. The study indicates that these systems do not meet industry security standards and are at risk of breaches that could compromise the integrity of elections. The discussion raises concerns about the implications of such vulnerabilities, suggesting that the ability to manipulate votes could be viewed as a new form of enfranchisement. It contrasts historical methods of gaining power, such as through force or financial influence, with modern hacking capabilities. The conversation also touches on public disenfranchisement and suggests that electronic voting could potentially increase voter turnout, although it questions whether this would lead to genuine progress in the electoral process.
edward
Messages
62
Reaction score
167
It now appears that Ohio's voting machine count can be manipulated using only a PDA and a magnet.

A study conducted over a two-month period this year found that Ohio's voting systems are seriously flawed. An 86-page report released by Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner says, "The findings in this study indicate that the computer-based voting systems in use in Ohio do not meet computer industry security standards, and are susceptible to breaches of security that may jeopardize the integrity of the voting process."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=4008511
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everyone treats these stories like they are a bad thing.
Think of it as a new form of enfranchisement.
Originally the person with most swords won.
Then the person who bought the most voters
Then the person who bought the most advertising space.

Now it's the person who equipped with a screwdriver and a serial cable can hack fastest.
Is there any reason to believe that this won't produce better results?
 
mgb_phys said:
Everyone treats these stories like they are a bad thing.
Think of it as a new form of enfranchisement.
Originally the person with most swords won.
Then the person who bought the most voters
Then the person who bought the most advertising space.

Now it's the person who equipped with a screwdriver and a serial cable can hack fastest.
Is there any reason to believe that this won't produce better results?

The poll numbers for Congress and GWB say the public is at an all time disenfranchisement low.

GWB and his gang stole two general elections, this is not progress.

Yes, we should demand better!
 
But those elections were stolen after the vote, the old fashioned way.

When you have electronic voting machines you will see a large rise in voter turnout -
I'm guessing the next election will be won by someone form google with a turnout of 2^32
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
238
Views
28K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top