On the ‘Sub-Additivity’ of Principal Eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter PoomjaiN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
PoomjaiN
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends & Colleagues,

I have a couple of nagging issues with mathematics I was hoping anyone of you would kindly be able to help resolve.

Given a few (let’s say 3) square matrices, A_1, A_2, A_3, and the corresponding principal eigenvector (eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue, as per eigenvalue decomposition) designated v_1, v_2, v_3. Define the aggregate matrix, A_0, and its corresponding principal eigenvector v_0
I wish to know (i) under which conditions would it be possible to guarantee that there exists a set of weights, w_1, w_2, w_3, such that w_1*v_1 + w_2*v_2 + w_3*v_3 = v_0 (which I am tempted to define as ‘sub-additivity’ vis-à-vis said principal eigenvectors), and (ii) whether an algorithm exists to find these weights, even for a severely restricted case.

Any enlightenment on this issue would be most truly appreciated.

Yours sincerely,
Poomjai Nacaskul (Ph.D.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgot to say A_0 = A_1 + A_2 + A_3.

In other words, underwhich condition is the principal eigenvector of the (weighted) sum of matrices equal to the (weighted) sum of principal eigenvectors of the corresponding matrices?

Simple question, yet I haven't been able to find the answer!

:-)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top