One ball dropped, another ball launched

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConfusedMonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conditions for two balls to collide mid-air, one dropped from height h0 and the other launched upward with speed v0. A key point is that for a collision to occur, v0 must exceed a specific threshold, specifically v0 > √(gh0/2). The participants analyze their equations for the positions of both balls and identify discrepancies between their calculations and the textbook's solution for the height of collision. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the correct application of gravitational acceleration and the proper substitution of time in their equations. Ultimately, the accuracy of the textbook's answer is questioned, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their own calculations.
ConfusedMonkey
Messages
42
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


A ball is dropped from rest at height ##h_0## above the ground. At the same instant, a second ball is launched with speed ##v_0## straight up from the ground, at a point directly below where the other ball is dropped. (a) Find a condition on ##v_0## such that the two balls will collide mid-air. (b) Find an expression for the height at which they collide.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Attempted solution for (a): I think all that is required is that ##v_0 > 0##. As long as the velocity is positive then the ball that is launched upward will be in the air by the time it collides with the ball that was dropped. But the textbook gives as a solution that we must have ##v_0 > \sqrt{gh_0/2}## where ##g = 9.8 m/s^2##. What's wrong with my thinking?

Attempted solution for (b): Let ##x_{dropped}(t)## be the position function of the ball that's dropped. Then ##x_{dropped}(t) = \frac{g}{2}t^2 + 0(t) + h_0 = \frac{g}{2}t^2 + h_0##. Now let ##x_{launched}(t)## be the position function of the ball that is launched. Then ##x_{launched}(t) = \frac{g}{2}t^2 + v_0t + 0 = \frac{g}{2}t^2 + v_0t##.

I can find at what time the two balls collide by equating the two above equations and solving for ##t##:

##x_{dropped} = x_{launched}##
##h_0 = v_0t##,

which gives ##t = \frac{h_0}{v_0}##. Plugging this solution into either ##x_{dropped}## or ##x_{launched}## gives the height of the collision as ##\frac{g}{2}\big(\frac{h_0}{v_0}\big)^2##. But the textbook's solution is ##h_0 - \frac{gh_0^2}{2v_0}##.

Could someone please tell me why my answers are wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ConfusedMonkey said:
What's wrong with my thinking?
You need them to collide before the lower ball falls to the ground.
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
Plugging this solution into either ##x_{dropped} ## or ##x_{launched}## gives the height of the collision as ##\frac{g}{2}\big(\frac{h_0}{v_0}\big)^2##.
No it doesn't. Try those again.
You appear to have chosen g to be the upward acceleration due to gravity, making it g=-9.8m/s2. I have no problem with that, but most people make g as positive downwards, writing the acceleration as -g, so that g has a positive value.
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
I can find at what time the two balls collide by equating the two above equations and solving for ##t##:

##x_{dropped} = x_{launched}##
##h_0 = v_0t##
.

It's interesting that this equation is independent of ##g##. Why do you think that is?

In fact, it's just a simple equation for one ball moving towards a stationary ball.
 
haruspex said:
No it doesn't. Try those again.
You appear to have chosen g to be the upward acceleration due to gravity, making it g=-9.8m/s2. I have no problem with that, but most people make g as positive downwards, writing the acceleration as -g, so that g has a positive value.
I'm on my phone, so please excuse the no LaTeX... So choosing the natural orientation for my coordinate system, I get x_dropped = -gt^2/2 + v_0t and x_launched = -gt^2/2 + h_0. Setting them equal and solving for t gives me t = h_0/v_0. Plugging this into one of my original equations gives -gh_0/(2v_0^2) + h_0. This is very similar to the textbook's answer, but is still not the same. I can't see where I am going wrong.

@PeroK I am guessing that my solution for t is independent of g because both balls are undergoing the exact same acceleration (the acceleration caused by gravity)
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
I'm on my phone, so please excuse the no LaTeX... So choosing the natural orientation for my coordinate system, I get x_dropped = -gt^2/2 + v_0t and x_launched = -gt^2/2 + h_0. Setting them equal and solving for t gives me t = h_0/v_0. Plugging this into one of my original equations gives -gh_0/(2v_0^2) + h_0. This is very similar to the textbook's answer, but is still not the same. I can't see where I am going wrong.

You've simply not substituted ##t = \frac{h_0}{v_0}## correctly.

ConfusedMonkey said:
@PeroK I am guessing that my solution for t is independent of g because both balls are undergoing the exact same acceleration (the acceleration caused by gravity)

Yes, that's correct.
 
Sorry, typo. I meant to type -gh_0^2/(2v_0^2) + h_0, but this is still different than the textbook's answer (their v_0 is not squared in the denominator)
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
Sorry, typo. I meant to type -gh_0^2/(2v_0^2) + h_0, but this is still different than the textbook's answer (their v_0 is not squared in the denominator)

What answer are you talking about?
 
ConfusedMonkey said:
But the textbook's solution is ##h_0 - \frac{gh_0^2}{2v_0}##.

This textbook answer is clearly wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes ConfusedMonkey
  • #10
Thanks for the help. I thought their answer may have been wrong too but because I am new to physics I am not comfortable assuming that.
 
Back
Top