One Dimensional Kinematics: Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by a 0.3 kg ball when it strikes the floor after being compressed 0.6 cm at a velocity of 9.29 m/s. The initial calculations used the kinematic equation to find acceleration, resulting in a force of -2157 N, assuming constant acceleration. However, it was later clarified that the force due to gravity (0.3 kg x 9.81 m/s²) must also be included, leading to a revised understanding of the total force exerted on the floor. The importance of considering both the force from the ball's impact and its weight was emphasized, confirming that the computer's answer was correct. This highlights the necessity of accounting for all forces in such physics problems.
TG3
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A .3 kg ball is compressed a maximum of 0.6 cm when it strikes the floor at 9.29 m/s. Assuming acceleration is constant, what is the force the ball exerts on the floor?

Homework Equations



vf^2 = v0^2 + 2A(x-x0)
Once I find A it will be easy, since
F=MA

The Attempt at a Solution



0^2 = 9.29^2 + 2A (.006)
0 = 86.3041 + .012 A
-86.3041= .012A
-7192= A
F=MA
F=.3 (-7192)
F= -2157
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks good to me! You have assumed constant acceleration, which probably isn't really right but which is probably a standard assumption in your course.

I actually did it a different way. I made a sketch of a v vs t graph, a straight line going from 9.29 at time 0 to zero at time t. The area under a v vs t graph is the distance .006. Using the area formula I was able to find the time t it takes for the ball to compress and stop. Then I used the idea that the slope on the v vs t graph is the acceleration. I got the same answer you have.
 
I found the "correct" answer: the computer wanted me to add the force due to gravity (.3 x 9.81) to the force exerted by the floor. This seems a bit conceptually shaky to me, but the computer said that was the correct answer. For my own future knowledge: is it, or was my first answer correct?
 
Oh dear, the computer is right! I forgot about the weight. Sorry.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top