One-Dimentional Kinematics Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeisconfused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a one-dimensional kinematics problem involving two cars with different speeds and accelerations. Car 1's motion equation was correctly derived as x1 = (20 m/s)t + (1.25 m/s²)t², matching the textbook answer. However, there is confusion regarding Car 2's equation, where the user initially wrote x2 = 1000m + (-30 m/s)t + (1.6 m/s²)t², which does not align with the textbook's answer. The user grapples with the signs of velocity and acceleration, leading to uncertainty about whether the error lies in their calculations or the textbook itself. Clarification is sought on the proper formulation of the equations for both cars.
joeisconfused
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Two cars drive on a straight highway. At time t = 0, car 1 passes mile marker 0 traveling due east with a speed of 20.0 m/s. At the same time, car 2 is 1.0 km east of mile marker 0 traveling at 30.0 m/s due west. Car 1 is speeding up with an acceleration of magnitude 2.5 m/s^2, and car 2 is slowing down with an acceleration of magnitude 3.2 m/s^2. Write x-versus-t equations of motion for both cars"


Homework Equations



The equation I used was X = Xi + ViT + 1/2 AT^2

Sorry, I'm bad at typing these equations without subscripts or superscripts.

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the equation right for Car 1. However, when I went to solve for Car two, it did not match with the answer key. I plugged in all of the relevant information into the equation:

X = 1000m + (-30 m/s)t + 1/2(3.2 m/s^2)t^2 = 1000m + (-30 m/s)t + (1.6 m/s^2)t^2

Since Car 2 is going towards the 0 marker, the velocity should be zero. However, in order for there to be deceleration, accerleration and velocity should have opposite signs. Since velocity is negative, I made acceleration positive.

However, this doesn't match the textbook answer, which is X = 1000m - (-30 m/s)t - (1.6 m/s)t^2

Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer my question!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about starting with two separate equations (as the problem suggests), one for each car. Fill in the blanks

x1 =

x2 =

Then it should be clearer what you're doing.
 
Hm...the textbook answer looks wrong; inserting t=1, we would get X = 1028.4m > 1000m, which is clearly not possible given that the car is heading towards the 0 mark.
 
Basically, the first one is simple enough to do without any trouble, and it's the second car that I'm having trouble with. To clear things up:

What I did for Car 1:

x1 = xi + vit + 1/2 at2
x1 = 0 m + (20 m/s)t + 1/2(2.5 m/s2)t2
x1= (20 m/s)t + (1.25 m/s2)t2

This answer matched with the textbook answer, so I didn't have any trouble for the first one. I simply plugged in the givens into the equation.

What I did for Car 2:

x2 = 1000m + (-30 m/s)t + 1/2(3.2 m/s2)t2
x2= 1000m + (-30 m/s)t + (1.6 m/s2)t2

My reasoning: Since Car 2 is going towards the 0 marker, the velocity should be zero. However, in order for there to be deceleration, accerleration and velocity should have opposite signs. Since velocity is negative, I made acceleration positive.

textbook answer is X2 = 1000m - (-30 m/s)t - (1.6 m/s)t2

Am I doing things incorrectly or is this a textbook error?

Edit: Just saw the above post. Thanks for the response!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top