One question, should be a quickie

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninoslino
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When connecting two coils of the same resistance in series and then in parallel to a constant-voltage line, the heat developed per minute changes significantly. The initial reasoning suggested that the heat in series would be four times greater than in parallel due to the resistance ratio. However, it was clarified that the power (and thus heat generation) is inversely proportional to resistance, meaning that the heat generated in parallel is actually greater. The correct conclusion is that the heat developed in parallel is four times greater than in series, not one fourth. Understanding the relationship between resistance and power is crucial for accurate calculations in these scenarios.
ninoslino
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. You connect two coils of the same resistance in series to a constant-voltage line. When you later connect them in parallel to the same line, the heat developed per minute, compared with the former rate is
a) the same
b) twice as great
c) one half as much
d) four times as great
e) one fourth as much

Now this is what I was thinking... since the ratio of the Reff series to Reff parallel would be 4:1, which means that the resistance would be 4 times greater in the series circuit and the resistance is proportional to the amount of heat lost... therefore the heat developed per minute would be 4 times greater. And since we want the parallel comapred to former, so parallel(heat)/former(heat) = 1/4 = one fourth = e.

Is there a flaw in my way of thinking? Thank you for your time guys (or girls).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

ninoslino said:
Now this is what I was thinking... since the ratio of the Reff series to Reff parallel would be 4:1, which means that the resistance would be 4 times greater in the series circuit
Right. So far, so good.
and the resistance is proportional to the amount of heat lost...
No. The rate of heat generated is the power consumed by the resistor. P = VI = V^2/R, so the power is proportional to the inverse of the resistance.
 
Thank you doc!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top