Ongoing human evolution (Myers quote)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ongoing nature of human evolution, countering the notion that it has ceased. Participants argue that evolution is likely accelerating due to the removal of traditional selective pressures, allowing for greater genetic variation. Advances in medicine and societal changes have enabled individuals with genetic variations, including deleterious genes, to survive and reproduce, contributing to a more diverse gene pool. The conversation highlights that while genetic variation continues, the current selective pressures are not well understood, and evolution is occurring not only at the individual level but also within society as a whole. The idea that evolution has stopped is dismissed as unfounded, emphasizing the need for a long-term perspective on human development and adaptation.
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,956
Reaction score
7
I recall there being several past topics where we debated whether evolution is still ongoing for humans. I just found & wanted to share http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/or_maybe_its_an_example_of_absurdist_british_humor/" ...

...the ridiculous idea that evolution has stopped for us. It hasn't, and in fact is probably accelerating, in the sense that we've removed many selective forces that would have culled back variants in the past—we're accumulating novelties in our genomes faster than before. It should also be self-evident that not everyone has children, and different people have different numbers of children, and people have different levels of success in raising healthy children to adulthood. The only way one could think evolution has stopped is if one has a very poor idea of what evolution is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
It hasn't, and in fact is probably accelerating, in the sense that we've removed many selective forces that would have culled back variants in the past—we're accumulating novelties in our genomes faster than before.
Can anyone explain or give some examples of what s/he's talking about here? Does he mean that things like medicine and charity have kept some people alive and reproductive, allowing the population to become more diverse?
 
honestrosewater said:
Can anyone explain or give some examples of what s/he's talking about here? Does he mean that things like medicine and charity have kept some people alive and reproductive, allowing the population to become more diverse?

Yes. There are two prongs to the argument: first, genetic variation hasn't stopped because of civilization; we all carry around a bunch of gene variations that we have acquired since birth; just random molecular events. We will pass them on to our children who will also acquire their own fresh variations, and so on. So new genes are entering the genome all the time, just as they did in the past.

Second, whereas genes that cause physical difficulties were partly eliminated in the past because the children who inherited them tended to die before having children of their own, medicine now keeps these individuals alive to pass those deliterious genes on. So not only is the common genetic variation going on just as in the past, but deliterious genes are not being weeded out as in the past.

Variation is one half of the evolution mechanism; selection is the other. We don't have a clear picture of what selective gradients exist in modern life, but we can be sure that some do exist and over time - if we have the time - they will evoke adaptations just as with Darwin's Finches.
 
Last part completely agree with, we have no idea at which levels selection is taking place now, its not just selection at the level of the organism but were also evolving as a society. Once we start to change our genetic makup I think we'll even speed up evolution (for good or better which is really irrelevant).
The notion that evolution has stopped for us is ridiculous, we've only been around for such a short while so there's really no way to tell. Let's wait for the next disaster and see what selection will have for us in store :)
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top