Op amp transfer function incorporating output impedance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the transfer function of an inverting op-amp circuit while accounting for the output impedance, Ro, and its interaction with load capacitance, which may cause oscillations. The initial transfer function derived is \frac{vo(s)}{vi(s)}=\frac{-A*RF}{(R1+RF)*(s*CL*Ro*RF+(Ro+RF))+A*R1}, simplifying to -RF/R1 for large A, but lacking the expected frequency-dependent component. Participants suggest that the model should include a more realistic op-amp gain that decreases with frequency, typically represented by a single pole. This adjustment is expected to yield a more accurate representation of the circuit's behavior. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly modeling the op-amp to analyze stability and response accurately.
jrive
Messages
58
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I was trying to derive the transfer function of a simple inverting op amp topology, incorporating the output impedance, Ro, of the non-ideal op amp, to see how it, when combined with a load capacitance can induce oscillations (or at least ringing). I haven't been able to get a valid answer --could be bookkeeping errors with the math, or just that my set up is incorrect for deriving the circuit's transfer function. Refer to the attached picture.

Using Laplace, the xfer function I end up with is:
\frac{vo(s)}{vi(s)}=\frac{-A*RF}{(R1+RF)*(s*CL*Ro*RF+(Ro+RF))+A*R1}

If A is really big...this simplifies to -RF/R1, which is sort-of expected for negligible Ro. However, I expected the frequency dependent component (which includes RO) to be part this result even as A is big, so I must be doing something wrong somewhere.

I suspect it has to do with the derivation of the xfer function using A(Vp-Vn). Basically, I obtain Vn via superposition of the contributions from Vin and Vo as \frac{(V1*RF +Vo*R1)}{(R1+RF)}, Vp =0, and then use KVL at the Vo node...That is...

\frac{-A*Vn-Vo}{Ro}+ \frac{(Vn-Vo)}{RF}=Vo*s*CL...I then sub in the equation for Vn above and solve for Vo/Vin...

Any help is appreciated...
Jorge
 

Attachments

  • opamp_ro.png
    opamp_ro.png
    16.9 KB · Views: 548
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi jrive! That looks like it will be a first-order system, so you won't get any oscillations out of that. You should model the op-amp more realistically. At least give it a gain that falls off with frequency, a single pole giving A₀/(1 + jω/ω₀). Typically, ω₀ is something like 100Hz, but if you look at the data sheet you'll see the corner frequency of its open loop gain.
 
yep...you're right NascentOxygen...thanks for pointing that out...I'll give that a shot to see if my math works out.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top