Opel GT on Incline: How Much HP Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VoyagerOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Incline
AI Thread Summary
To determine the horsepower needed for a 2072lb Opel GT to ascend a 20-degree incline at the same speed as on flat ground, calculations indicate that approximately 137 HP is required, assuming no friction or air resistance. However, a more detailed analysis suggests that the actual power needed is around 317.72 HP when accounting for various forces, including rolling resistance and gravity. The original problem lacks sufficient information to accurately calculate the vertical speed, which is crucial for determining the additional power required. The discussion highlights the complexity of the physics involved, emphasizing that simple ratios may not yield accurate results. Overall, precise calculations are necessary to assess the power requirements for vehicles on inclines.
VoyagerOne
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok this question came up on a car forum and i tried to answer it, but I think my answer is way to simple and I solved the problem incorrectly
1. A 2072lb Opel GT goes up 20 degree incline how much horsepower will the car need to get up the hill at the same speed as the same car on the ground. The car on the ground has 102 HP
2. I didn't solve this one: Both cars now start from rest and travel a quarter mile. Assuming the car on the ground completes the distance in 18 seconds how much HP will be needed for the car on the incline to finish in the same amount of time. (accel is constant)
Dont worry about friction or air resistance all things are equal.



Homework Equations


mgcosΘ and mgsinθ


The Attempt at a Solution


The force against a 9210.46 Newton (2072lb) Opel GT on an incline of 20° would be equal to mass*gravity(sin20°) which rounds to about 3153 Newtons (708.8 lbs)
So without any air resistance, friction, wheels falling off, fuel leaks, drivers, passengers, or dead bodies in rear console, your Opel would "weigh" 2780.8lbs.
Let's say you have the top spec stock high comp GT with 102HP. Your HP to weight ratio would be .03668009 hehe (very roughly 1 hp per 27.8 lbs)
On the ground your HP to weight ratio is 0.04922779! (Very roughly 1 HP per 20.7 lbs)
Xhp/2780.8=.04922779
Hp up hill would have to be about 137hp to equal the car on the level surface!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't seem to me to be enough information. I don't think you can simply take the ratio of the forces like that.
Suppose the rolling resistance is F, the extra downslope force due to gravity is F', the speed is v, the power on the level is P, and the extra power up the slope is P'.
Then you have
Fv = P
(F+F')v = P+P'
You know P and F', but that leaves three unknowns and only two equations. You can deduce F'v = P', but that still doesn't help. In the attempt posted, you have effectively assumed F = weight of car, which is not true.
 
Give your car some arbitrary drag co-efficients :
Cd = air drag co-efficient (sea level) = 0.45
Crr = wheel rolling resistance co-efficient = 0.03
Level ground drive wheel power = 102 hp = 76,061 Watts
Mass = 2,072 lbs = 934 kg
Top speed of this vehicle = 115.45 mph
Power required by this vehicle up a 20 degree incline at the same speed = 317.72 hp
 
As above.

To work out the extra power needed going up hill you need to know or calculate the vertical speed. There isn't enough info in the original problem to do that. For example if the speed was slow (or the hill shallow) then the power required to overcome drag and rolling resistance would dominate and the same power would be required going up hill as on the flat.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top