Operations on Ideals - Hello Experts

  • Thread starter Thread starter DukeSteve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
DukeSteve
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello Experts,

I post this question here because in the homework topics there is no abstract algebra!
Please help me I want to understand it:

I have a ring R with unit. Also I am given n - natural number, I_n is the set {x in R: n*x = 0}

I have to prove or refute: Given n, m natural numbers:

A) Is I_n + I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?
B) Is I_n intersection with I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?
C) Is I_n union with I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?

I just used the Bezout's identity that d = ax+by for any d is a common devisor of a,b, and x,y are integers.
And I get that A is a proof.
For B I don't know how to start...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DukeSteve said:
Hello Experts,

I post this question here because in the homework topics there is no abstract algebra!
Please help me I want to understand it:

I have a ring R with unit. Also I am given n - natural number, I_n is the set {x in R: n*x = 0}

I have to prove or refute: Given n, m natural numbers:

A) Is I_n + I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?
B) Is I_n intersection with I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?
Let's write I_n=nR##.
##nR \cap mR = (l.c.m.)R## which is again an ideal of this form. Bezout in part A) gave you the greatest common divisor, now we need the least common multiple.
C) Is I_n union with I_m is an ideal of the form of I_k?
No. E.g. ##2\mathbb{Z} \cup 3\mathbb{Z} = \{\,\ldots,-6,-4,-3,-2,0,2,3,4,6,\ldots\,\}## but ##2+3=5 \notin 2\mathbb{Z} \cup 3\mathbb{Z}##.
I just used the Bezout's identity that d = ax+by for any d is a common devisor of a,b, and x,y are integers.
And I get that A is a proof.
Yes, right ideals to be exact: ##(nR+mR)\cdot R \subseteq nR+mR## and ##nR+mR = dR = kR## with Bezout's lemma, correct.
For B I don't know how to start...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top