Can Operators A and B Always Be Applied to a General State in Tensor Space?

Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1
Hey,

My brain seems to have shut down. Let's say I'm working in the space H_a \otimes H_b and I have an operator A and B on each of these spaces respectively. Furthermore, consider a general state in the tensor space |\psi \rangle = | x_1 \rangle |y_1\rangle + |x_2 \rangle |y_2 \rangle (ignoring normalization). Now in my head, I keep on thinking that if I wanted to apply the operator A \otimes B to | \psi \rangle I couldn't simply go

A \otimes B | \psi \rangle = A| x_1 \rangle B|y_1\rangle + A|x_2 \rangle B|y_2 \rangle

However, I was playing around with some values today (assuming finite dimensions), and from what I tried it always seemed to work. Can we do this in general, or did I just get lucky in all my trials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's fine. First, AxB is defined so that (AxB)(|y> x |z>)=(A|y> x B|z>), and second, the operator (AxB) is linear on the tensor space...call (A\times B)=O and |y> \times |z>=\Psi. Then O (\Psi_1+\Psi_2)=(O\Psi_{1}+O\Psi_{2}). Then use the first property for each of the terms. (the "x" is product)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top