Opposing forces and Newton's third law

AI Thread Summary
Newton's third law states that every force has an equal and opposite reaction, meaning that forces exist in pairs. The discussion clarifies that the force opposite to friction is friction itself, and the same applies to tension. It emphasizes that while forces act on different objects, they are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, as illustrated by examples like friction between hands or gravitational forces between Earth and a person. The conversation also touches on the concept of conservation of momentum, stating that forces cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred. Ultimately, the sum of internal forces in a closed system is zero, but this does not imply the absence of internal forces.
member 529879
According to Newton's third law, every force has an equal and opposite reaction force. Which force is equal and opposite to both friction and tension?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Newton's 3rd law is telling us that every force is its own pair. So the force opposite friction is friction and the force opposite tension is tension. For example, if you slide a box across the floor, the same friction force acts in one direction on the box and in the opposite direction on the floor.
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
russ_watters said:
Newton's 3rd law is telling us that every force is its own pair.
That is a confusing way to put it. I would rather say:

Each force of a certain type has an equal but opposite counterpart of the same type.
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
Scheuerf said:
According to Newton's third law, every force has an equal and opposite reaction force. Which force is equal and opposite to both friction and tension?

The question is not clear.

The below words from Wiki will help you understand Newton's law better:
"Whatever draws or presses another is as much drawn or pressed by that other. If you press a stone with your finger, the finger is also pressed by the stone."

I hope you can form the better question now. In the way, you might even get an answer. Good Luck.
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
Both forces in a force pair described in Newton's third law exist but are not both acting on the same object, otherwise objects would all be in equilibrium. The force of tension on an object from a rope has a force of an equal magnitude on the other end of the rope.
A good example of force pairs is the fact that the force of gravity applied on you by the Earth is EQUAL to the gravitational force you apply to the Earth all though opposite in direction. These 2 forces- you're gravitational pull and the Earth's gravitational pull- are the reaction pairs.
As you mentioned friction, when you rub your hands together and were to draw an FBD for each hand, you would find that a friction force is acting on each hand but in the opposite direction of the friction on the other hand.
Like matter and energy, force cannot be created or destroyed. In every situation that a force is applied, another force of equal magnitude that is opposite in direction is applied to another object.
 
The fact that forces come in third-law pairs means that the a system subject to no net external forces will also have no net internal force. That supports the idea of conservation of momentum. You might say that momentum can never be created or destroyed, just moved from one object to another.

Forces are as easy to create or destroy as candle flames. If you stop leaning on the wall, that force is gone!
 
jbriggs444 said:
The fact that forces come in third-law pairs means that the a system subject to no net external forces will also have no net internal force.

This is a bit misleading. The sum of all internal forces are always zero.
 
Orodruin said:
This is a bit misleading. The sum of all internal forces are always zero.

*the sum of all the forces in a full system are zero.
If the sum of forces on every object was zero, nothing would move because everything would be in equilibrium
 
Bendelson said:
*the sum of all the forces in a full system are zero.
If the sum of forces on every object was zero, nothing would move because everything would be in equilibrium

This does not in any way contradict what I said. The sum of all internal forces being zero obviuosly does not mean yhere are no internal forces.
 
Back
Top