Optical Diffraction: Double Slit & Gratings

  • Thread starter Thread starter the riddick25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
AI Thread Summary
A double slit does diffract light of different wavelengths into different directions, as indicated by the formula that includes wavelength. The discussion clarifies that diffraction gratings, which have many slits, operate similarly to double slits but require different spacing for varying wavelengths. For cm waves compared to optical wavelengths, the spacing between the slits must increase to achieve the same diffraction angle. This highlights the relationship between wavelength and grating design in diffraction phenomena. Overall, understanding these principles is essential for solving related physics problems.
the riddick25
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


first question; Does a double slit also diffract light of different wavelength into different directions?

second question; How would a diffraction grating for cm waves differ from an optical grating?

Homework Equations


sin (theta) = m.Lambda / d

maybe, i am unsure if this is needed or not, i think it is for the 2nd question

The Attempt at a Solution


for the first question, i looked in my book and could not find anything which said that the light of different wavelengths difracted to different locations, but as the formula for the double slit includes the wavelength, i would guess that they would be diffrected to different places, but i am unsure.

second question i couldn't really answer as i don't know what the difference between da diffrection grating and an optical grating is, if someone could tell me, or show me somewhere i can find out then it would be much appreciated.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the riddick25 said:

Homework Statement


first question; Does a double slit also diffract light of different wavelength into different directions?

second question; How would a diffraction grating for cm waves differ from an optical grating?

Homework Equations


sin (theta) = m.Lambda / d

maybe, i am unsure if this is needed or not, i think it is for the 2nd question

The Attempt at a Solution


for the first question, i looked in my book and could not find anything which said that the light of different wavelengths difracted to different locations, but as the formula for the double slit includes the wavelength, i would guess that they would be diffrected to different places, but i am unsure.

second question i couldn't really answer as i don't know what the difference between da diffrection grating and an optical grating is, if someone could tell me, or show me somewhere i can find out then it would be much appreciated.

thanks in advance

You are correct; if you increase the wavelength, you can change the angle at which the beam comes out. I found a nice http://phys.educ.ksu.edu/vqm/html/doubleslit/" online that shows how changing the energy (which is proportional to the wavelength) increases or decreases the number of peaks.

Diffraction grating is very much like the double slit experiment, except there are 100's to 1000's of slits for light to pass through. I think all types of grating are considered optical grating as it will affect visible light just as well as infrared and ultraviolet light.
My guess is that it's looking for a comparison of spacing necessary between (a) nm light (visible is in the range 350-750, depending on who you ask) and (b) cm electromagnetic waves (microwaves at this range)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks :)

and i understand the second question a bit more now, but i am still unsure as to what the answer is, if i am thinking along the right lines, then for a beam of light and a microwave to have the same diffraction angle, then the space between the gratings would need to increase if the wavelength does.

is this right? or have i gone wrong somewhere in my thinking.

it has been a while since i was taught this, and it seems to have slipped away from me :(
 
Given the form of the question, it seems to me they are asking for the difference in grating distances for some given angle \theta and their respective wavelengths.
 
thanks :)

i've got my answer, and hopefully its right, if not then at least i'll learn something for next time :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top