Optics : Diffraction gratings.

  • Thread starter Thread starter planesinspace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a textbook problem involving a transmission diffraction grating with 600 slits per mm, examining spectral features near 450 nm. The individual seeks clarification on calculating the minimum wavelength difference needed to distinguish two spectral lines without them blending into a single peak. Key equations discussed include d*sin(theta) = m*lambda for diffraction and R = lambda/delta lambda for resolving power. The user calculates theta as 32.6 degrees and determines the resolving power, ultimately arriving at a delta lambda of 3.75x10^-12 m. The calculations appear to be on the right track for solving the problem.
planesinspace
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. I am attempting a question from a textbook but the wording or perhaps the question itself is confusing me.
*Light falls at perpendicular incidence on a transmission diffraction grating. The second order diffracted light leaving the grating is examined.
The grating has 600 slits per mm, a total width of 10 cm, and is being used to examine spectral features near a wavelength of 450 nm. How close ( in nm) can the wavelength of two spectral lines be, for the two to still be seen as two, rather than blended into a single intensity peak?





Homework Equations


Ok so I have done question son diffraction gratings before, but all straightforward, and using the equation d*sin theta =m*lamda



The Attempt at a Solution



i have worked out theta to be 32.6 degrees, and (not sure if this is right) but used the equation for double-slit diffraction: y=m*lamda*D/d and worked out the spacing between the maximum and the first minimum, y, to be 0.05389m. Is this at all on the right track or am I totally lost?

I fear the latter. Any help much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you want to look up the formulas dealing with resolving power. There is one that gives the resolving power needed to differentiate two close wavelengths in this experiment; and there is another that gives the resolving power of a specific diffraction grating that depends on the order number.
 
Thanks, i found the equation R=lamda/deltalamda
and R=mN, where N is the number of gratings and m the order.
So i basically worked out R from the second equation where I have both m and N, then I plugged it into the first and got 3.75x10^-12 m for delta lamda, is that on the right track?
 
That looks right to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top