Optics reflection/refraction problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter raindrops
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving optics, specifically reflection and refraction in a water-filled tank. The key question is whether marks on the tank can be seen from the top or bottom, requiring an understanding of Snell's Law to analyze light behavior as it passes through different media. Participants emphasize the importance of sketching light rays from the marks to the observer's eye level to visualize the scenario. The need for a mathematical approach to determine visibility is highlighted, suggesting calculations based on the refractive index of water. Ultimately, the problem requires both conceptual understanding and mathematical application to find the correct answer.
raindrops
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 80 cm tall, 65 cm wide tank shown in the figure is completely filled with water (n=1.33). The tank has marks every 10 cm along one wall, and the 0 cm mark is barely submerged. As you stand beside the opposite wall, your eye is level with the top of the water.

a.) Can you see the marks from the top of the tank (the 0cm mark) going down, or from the bottom of the tank (the 80cm mark) coming up? Explain

b.) Which is the lowest or highest mark, depending on the your answer to part a, that you can see?

Homework Equations



I'm not sure what equations are relevant. maybe snell's law? n1sin\vartheta2=n2sin\vartheta2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really not sure where to even start.
** drawing is attached.
 

Attachments

  • physics drawin.png
    physics drawin.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 1,363
Physics news on Phys.org


Sketch the rays coming form the marks to your eye.
 


He's looking for a mathematical answer, not just a drawing. Any ideas on how to do that?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top