[Optics] Starting a fire with a magnifying glass

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Atrika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Glass Optics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors that influence the effectiveness of a magnifying glass in starting a fire by focusing sunlight. Participants explore various aspects such as lens size, focal length, and optical quality, as well as the underlying physics involved in heat concentration and energy transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Philippe inquires about the factors that make a magnifying glass effective for starting fires, suggesting size, magnifying power, and thickness as potential influences.
  • Some participants propose that the size of the lens is crucial, as it determines the area available for gathering sunlight, which correlates with heat output.
  • Others argue that the ability of the lens to focus light into a small spot is also significant, with examples comparing different sizes of magnifying glasses and their resulting image sizes.
  • A participant mentions that to achieve the highest temperature, one should aim for a small image of the sun, implying that a shorter focal length may be beneficial.
  • Discussion includes the importance of the f-number of the lens, with one participant noting that a lens with a low f-number can collect more energy and focus it effectively.
  • Another participant introduces a formula related to lens performance and irradiance, suggesting that both focal length and diameter are important for effective fire-starting.
  • Some participants share personal experiences with different types of lenses, including double-element lenses, and their effectiveness in starting fires.
  • Questions arise about how to determine the focal length of a magnifying glass before purchase, highlighting a lack of information typically provided on packaging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that lens size and quality are important factors in starting a fire, but there is no consensus on the relative importance of focal length versus diameter, or the best conditions for achieving ignition. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal characteristics of a magnifying glass for fire-starting.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of effectiveness and the lack of consensus on the interplay between various factors such as focal length, diameter, and optical quality. Some assumptions about the conditions necessary for ignition are also not fully explored.

Atrika
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'd like to know what makes a http://tinyurl.com/4dp9ocl" better at starting a fires by focusing the sun light. Is it the magnifying power, it's size, it's thickness (etc.) ? Also, is there a formula to calculate it ?

Thank you.

-Philippe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Philippe! Welcome to PF! :smile:

It's really only the size …

the total heat output equals (obviously!) the heat input, which is proportional to the area of the lens. :wink:

(the magnifying power only alters the position of the focus, not the amount of heat there)
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Philippe! Welcome to PF! :smile:

It's really only the size …

the total heat output equals (obviously!) the heat input, which is proportional to the area of the lens. :wink:

(the magnifying power only alters the position of the focus, not the amount of heat there)

Hi Tim, isn't it also affected by the magnifying glass' ability to pinpoint light?

ex: I have a 2" magnifying glass that produces an image of the sun of 2mm
I have a 4" magnifying glass that produces an image of the sun of 4mm

Both images will have the same heat output/size so the 4" magnifying glass won't start a fire faster, am I right ?

edit:
"As you said, spot size will be determined in part by lens aberrations. You can get rid of chromatic aberrations by using a fancy compound lens, or more simply by using a parabolic mirror instead. If you get rid of all aberrations, then the spot size will be the focal length times the angular size of the sun in the sky (9.6 milliradians)." -Krab

Does this mean that the most important factors are the size and the quality of the lens ?
 
Last edited:
Interesting question. Tim's point about the area of the lens determining the amount of energy that can be gathered to a spot must be correct. But whether that will make the spot any hotter (higher temperature) than a lens with a smaller area is a slightly different issue. To make it as hot as possible you would have to have the image of the sun as small as possible, which is a matter of having as short a focal length as possible. So it would seem to me that having the largest ratio of lens area to image area (or focal length) would give you the highest temperature.

Whether that will start a fire faster, though, may depend on what it is you are trying to light. A small spot at a high temperature might not be as good as a large spot at a lower temperature (but still higher than the ignition temperature of what it is you are trying to light).

AM
 
Last edited:
Interesting.
 
Last edited:
Disregarding spherical aberrations, the f# of the lens is the key figure. In the geometrical limit, a large f# lens collects lots of energy and focuses it in a small spot.
My Swiss Army knife has a a magnifying glass whose f# is about 1 (2 cm diameter and 2 cm focal length). It performs very well as a fire igniter (dry leaves, small twigs)
 
This was first worked out in connection with searchlights- how powerfula light must be to illuminate a target- and is presented very nicely by Slyusarev, in "On the Possible and Impossible in Optics" (FTD-TT-62-175-1+2).

Using the sun as a source (subtending 31' of arc), the formula simplifies to

E = E0 (110/F)^2,

where E is the irradiance (W/m^2, for example) using a lens with a certain f-number (F, F = focal length/diameter), and E0 is the irradiance from the sun (1 kW/m^2 at most). For example, using a lens at f/2 increases the irradiance by 3000, and can easily set fire to small bits of wood.

Whether or not you can set fire to something requires a balance between incident power and power radiated by the hot object; this balance shows that the 'bare' sun cannot heat a body beyond 120 C. Dry wood ignites around 600C, in order to ignite wood within 30 minutes requires incident power approximately 40 times the 'bare' sun; to ignite wood within 8 seconds requires 100 times the incident power.
 
If F = focal length / diameter, it means both are equally important.
Is there a way to find out the focal length of a magnifying glass before buying it ? The only thing written on the boxes is the magnification and the diameter of the lens.
 
I used to have a double-element lens salvaged from broken binoculars which was a remarkably effective fire-starter: Thanks to the doublet, the chromatic abberation was very small, multiplying the effective size of the lens...
 
  • #10
Atrika said:
If F = focal length / diameter, it means both are equally important.
Is there a way to find out the focal length of a magnifying glass before buying it ? The only thing written on the boxes is the magnification and the diameter of the lens.

The focal length of a lens is not related to the magnification. Most magnifying lenses have fairly short focal lengths- much less than a meter, usually several centimeters or less.
 
  • #11
Andy Resnick said:
The focal length of a lens is not related to the magnification. Most magnifying lenses have fairly short focal lengths- much less than a meter, usually several centimeters or less.
Yes, I see. Thank you all for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K