Optimisation Lagrangian Problem

JoshMaths
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
No this is not homework.

http://imgur.com/zAZxmuC
http://imgur.com/zAZxmuC

Ok i am struggling to even start this question.

I see it has a constraint so i would be tempted to use Lagrangian but from there i don't see how px and qy fit into it?

Some assistance on the tools needed to approach this question would be great, it may be two-variable optimisation but i don't really have a handle on that either.

Thanks,

Josh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks like Lagrange multiplier theory would come in handy. Look at the intro to this Wikipedia page...

For instance (see Figure 1), consider the optimization problem
maximize ##f(x, y)##
subject to ##g(x, y) = c##
That is exactly your problem (for suitable f, g and c).

Note that px is just one of the given constants p multiplied by the variable x, I'm not sure why that confuses you.
 
Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top