Optimization - find two points on a curve with a common tangent line?

[therest]

Homework Statement

Find two points on curve y=x⁴-2x²-x that have a common tangent line.

Homework Equations

*the one stated above
dy/dx = 4x³-4x-1

The Attempt at a Solution

equation of a tangent line: y=mx+b

(4x³-4x-1) = m at two different points? So there are two points for which dy/dx=4x³-4x-1

I'm not sure what thinking I should be doing on this one to link the information about there being two points in the curve with the same tangent line to what I know about finding tangent lines. Will the coordinate points contain x or can I find two actual, definite points? Aren't there more than 2 places on the curve with the same tangent lines?

 

[Mentallic]

edit: I rechecked my work and it seems like I got the answer, but by shear luck.

 

[Bohrok]

It looks like there are only two points that have a common tangent line.

If (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b)) are the two points, you know the derivatives at the points are the same: f'(a) = f'(b)
Also, the derivative is the same as the slope of the line between the two points: m = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

You can write two equations with two unknowns to solve for the two points.

 

[therest]

OH!

Thank you so much Bohrok! I think I know exactly what to do from there. :)

 

[therest]

Hmm, or not. I think I'm stuck.

Here's what I did:

y=x⁴-2x²-x
dy/dx=4x³-4x-1=m

m=(y₂-y₁) / (x₂-x₁)=(b_y - a_y) / (b_x - a_x)

--> x + y subscripts are being used to denote the x and y coordinates of points a and b which share a tangent line.

y=mx+c (c is the constant; I was already using b as a variable, sorry for confusion.)
y=(4x³-4x-1)x + c
a_y=(4a_x³-4a_x-1)a_x+c
b_y=(4b_x³-4b_x-1)b_x+c

Maybe I need to resist the temptation to break it down like I would in Physics.

It seems like I'm overcomplicating the problem. Can I solve it by just finding a_(x,y) and b_(x,y) from those equations?

 

[Bohrok]

Only have a few minutes right now, but I think this is what I'd do:

f'(a) = (f(b) - f(a))/(b - a)
and
f'(b) = (f(b) - f(a))/(b - a)

This is the system of equations to solve after you put in the function and its derivative. Once you know a and b, then you can start finding the actual line equation y = mx + b.
m = (b_y - a_y) / (b_x - a_x), then you find the constant in the line equation.

 

[Mentallic]

I had tried Bohrok's method earlier, but the system of equations seemed far too complicated to solve. Since I got stuck, I went back to that method again...

Once you substitute into
f'(a)=\frac{f(a)-f(b)}{a-b}
and
f'(b)=\frac{f(a)-f(b)}{a-b}

You'll end up having to solve these 2 equations:

4a^3-4a-1=\frac{b^4-2b^2-b-a^4+2a^2+a}{b-a}
and
4b^3-4b-1=\frac{b^4-2b^2-b-a^4+2a^2+a}{b-a}

Using a calculator, the solutions for (a,b) are (-1,1) and (1,1). It should be simple from here

 

[therest]

wow, awesome! That actually makes sense! Mentallic and Bohrok, thank you so much! I ended up getting the same answers.

 

[aromashchenko]

I have a similar problem with y=x^4-4x^3+4x^2+0.5x
(where I have to find the line, which is tangent to the curve at two points)

but I need to know how to do it without a calculator. Suggestions?

 

[Mentallic]

As long as it doesn't seem too daunting, sure, you can do it without a calculator.

Notice from the posts already made that

f'(a)=f'(b)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}

And since we're dealing with the function

y=x^4-4x^3+4x^2+0.5x

That means f'(a)= \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a} becomes 4a^3-12a^2+8a+0.5=\frac{(b^4-4b^3+4b^2+0.5b)-(a^4-4a^3+4a^2+0.5a)}{b-a}

Now, on the right side, group together the power terms so in the numerator we have
(b^4-a^4)-4(b^3-a^3)+4(b^2-a^2)+0.5(b-a) and each term has a factor of b-a in it so we can cancel that out.
Once we do that, it'll be hard to spot but you can actually divide the equation that is equal to 0 by b-a again. So now you have an equation in a and b (it's actually an ellipse) and so if we then solve for the next equation

f'(b)= \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}

Once you solve this one, you'll notice it is symmetrical to the other equation (you might even notice the symmetry before even solving it, saving you heaps of time) and so since these equations are inverses of each other, there is an obvious way of finding where they intersect each other.

 

[aromashchenko]

thanks! that group factoring was the trick that I was missing. :-)

 

[Mentallic]

No worries

 

[wishIknewmore]

mentallic... how did you get you two points originally with your calculator? I'm just confused on what you tested?