Optimization Problem Solution - Checking and Verification

  • Thread starter Thread starter opticaltempest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Is anyone willing to check my solution to this problem? The problem is described on part 1 of the solution.

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/5418/solution016dj.jpg"

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/7669/solution025zk.jpg"

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/6652/solution030fr.jpg"

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3950/solution048zi.jpg"

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/7357/solution059yw.jpg"

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting a broken link on your page two, but it doesn't matter. Your work is fine - well laid out and correct.

Two things: 1) You can also eliminate r=0 as a solution by checking the first derivative in its vicinity. It leads to a maximum, as you might guess.

2) I'm not extraordinarily fond of the way you express h. If I were your professor, I'd ask you to clean up the arithmetic a bit - but that's your call and his.

Good job.
 
Thanks for checking it over Diane_
 
1/2\,{v}^{2}={\frac {{\it GM}}{y}}
 
\[\int \!v{dv}=-{\it GM}\,\int \!{y}^{-2}{dy}\]}

testing out latex... ignore last two replies by me
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top