Optimizing Can Dimensions for Minimizing Material Usage

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the dimensions of a circular cylinder (can) to minimize the surface area while maintaining a fixed volume of 50. The relevant equations for volume and surface area are provided, and the original poster attempts to derive the relationship between the radius and height to find the optimal dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their approach to solving the problem by substituting the height in terms of the radius into the surface area equation and taking the derivative to find critical points. They seek confirmation of their calculations and understanding of the implications of their results.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the original poster's calculations, suggesting methods to verify whether the critical point found is a minimum. There is a discussion about the nature of the surface area in relation to the volume constraint, with some participants clarifying that there is no maximum surface area for the given volume.

Contextual Notes

Participants explore the implications of increasing the radius on the surface area, noting that as the radius increases, the surface area does not have an upper limit. This discussion highlights the assumptions regarding the relationship between the dimensions of the can and the constraints imposed by the problem.

Sheneron
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Minimizing Surface Area

Homework Statement


A can is to be manufactured in the shape of a circular cylinder with volume = 50.
Find the dimensions of a can that would minimize the amount of material needed to make the can.


Homework Equations


V = [tex]\pi r^2 h[/tex]
SA = [tex]2 \pi r^2 + 2 \pi r h[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I have never done a problem like this so I am unsure how to do it, but here is my attempt.

With the volume equation I solved for h. [tex]h = \frac{50}{\pi r^2}[/tex]
I plugged this value for h into the Surface area equation. [tex]SA = 2 \pi r^2 + 2 \pi r \frac{50}{\pi r^2}[/tex]

which = [tex]2 \pi r^2 + \frac{100}{r}[/tex]

I then took the derivative of that and set it equal to 0.
[tex]0 = 4 \pi r - 100 r^-2[/tex]
[tex]r = \sqrt[3]{\frac{100}{4 \pi}}[/tex]
r = 1.996

Then I plugged that back into the volume equation to solve for h and got h= 3.99.
Could someone tell if this is right and if not where I went wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. Check your result by plugging in a number smaller than r and a number bigger than r into the derivative. If a number smaller than r makes the derivative negative and a number larger than r makes the derivative positive, then r would be a minimum.
 
So is that how I know that its a minimum instead of a maximum. I'm still a little confused about that. What would I do if I wanted to solve this problem for a maximum?
 
There is no maximum.
 
Does it not have one? Even though the volume is set to 50 there is no max Surface area?
 
If you keep increasing r, the surface area just gets bigger and bigger without bound. The height gets smaller, but there is a separate [tex]2\pi r^2[/tex] term in the surface area calculation. That's why there is no maximum surface area.
 
I understand I think. h could get infinitely small which would make the surface area infinitely large.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K