Optimizing Energy of Hydrogen Atom with 3D Oscillator Wavefunction

  • Thread starter Thread starter oomphgalore20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
oomphgalore20
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Take as a trial wavefunction for the hydrogen atom the 3D oscillator ground state wavefunction
ψ(r) = N exp (-br^2 / 2). Calculate the value of b that gives the best energy and calculate this energy.

Homework Equations



Radial part of ∇^2 = 1/r2 (∂/∂r) (r^2 ∂/∂r)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure what best energy is supposed to imply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
Is this following a chapter about the variational method?
 
There is no fixed textbook, so I'm not sure what chapter this precedes or follows; we've covered the simple harmonic oscillator in 1D and went into the variational method while covering perturbation theory. I thought the 3D SHO is an extension of the 1D system, but this 'best energy' is throwing me off.
 
In a variational method problem it would make sense to take a trial function and vary the parameter b in order to get a higher bound for the ground state energy ("best" energy?), that's why I'm asking. i can't think of another meaning in the context you're giving...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top