Optimizing Solubility: Manipulating [OH-] for Precipitation Control

  • Thread starter Thread starter dav1d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
AI Thread Summary
To lower the solubility of Mg(OH)2 to 1.5 x 10^-5 mol/L, the appropriate concentration of [OH-] must be calculated using the solubility product constant (Ksp) of 1.5 x 10^-11. The Ksp equation for Mg(OH)2 is expressed as Ksp = [Mg2+][OH-]^2. The discussion emphasizes that instead of using the ICE table method, one should directly determine the [OH-] concentration that results in a [Mg2+] of 1.5 x 10^-5 M. Participants suggest reviewing textbook materials or additional resources for clarity on the calculations. Understanding the relationship between [OH-] and Mg2+ is crucial for effective precipitation control.
dav1d
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What [OH-] would lower the solubility of Mg(OH)2
to 1.5 x 10-5 mol/L?
Ksp is 1.5 x 10-11 for Mg(OH)2.


Homework Equations



Ksp=products/reactants

The Attempt at a Solution



ICE box method

Mg OH (2) Mg(OH)2
initial: ? and I don't know what to do from here or even if this is the correct method to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need ICE table here, just check at what OH- concentration concentration of Mg2+ is 1.5x10-5M.
 
1.5 x 10^-5 = [Mg(OH)2]/[Mg][OH]

correct?
 
Write formula for Ksp of Mg(OH)2.
 
Borek said:
Write formula for Ksp of Mg(OH)2.

Ksp=products/reactants
=[Mg(OH)2]/[Mg][OH]^2

from the equation Mg+2OH = Mg(OH)2
 
No, you need to reread the book. Or check some other sources.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top