Optimizing structure for toppling

AI Thread Summary
A user is designing a standing frame for disabled children and seeks to optimize it against toppling under a force applied at the top. They are considering changing dimensions within specific limitations, including minimum length, maximum width, and weight of the plate. The discussion highlights that while different structural designs may affect overall stability, toppling stability remains consistent as long as height and width are unchanged. The user proposes a formula to assess toppling stability, suggesting that the vector sum of the frame's weight and the applied force must pass through the base to prevent toppling. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining the center of mass and structural integrity in the design process.
Harsh188
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi! everyone...

I'm a building a standing frame for disabled children, the structure in elemental form is shown in picture.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60ALttRvwKmdzRGc0pGWlN5Z3c/edit?usp=sharing
link to picture - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60ALttRvwKmdzRGc0pGWlN5Z3c/edit?usp=sharing

Now, I want to optimize the structure for toppling, let's say a force, F is acting on the top most part, fig(a).
I can change dimensions but there are certain limitations like minimum length of the frame, maximum width and maximum weight of the plate. So, how do I optimize all these things keeping in condition that frame doesn't topple??

Also, can I do better optimization by changing structure as shown in fig(b), and fig(c)? if yes, how?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The vector sum of frame weight and F must go though the frame's base, to prevent toppling.

Your a,b,c variants have different structural stability, but the same toppling stability, as long h & W as the same. Unless the weight of the frame or its center of mass position change significantly.
 
A.T. said:
The vector sum of frame weight and F must go though the frame's base, to prevent toppling.

Your a,b,c variants have different structural stability, but the same toppling stability, as long h & W as the same. Unless the weight of the frame or its center of mass position change significantly.

hmm... toppling stability actually makes sense.
So, can I just say, FcosA*h=mg*W/2? (neglecting the mass of vertical bar)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top