Orbit of almost 1 eccentricity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luxtpm7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eccentricity Orbit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of orbits with high eccentricity, particularly focusing on a hypothetical scenario involving a ball dropped through a tunnel from the North Pole to the South Pole of the Earth. Participants explore the implications of such an orbit, the nature of gravitational forces, and the behavior of objects in elliptical orbits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that a ball dropped into a tunnel from the North Pole would achieve an orbit with eccentricity close to one, suggesting it could exit the Northern Hemisphere.
  • Another participant argues that the orbit would not be standard elliptical since the center of mass of the Earth cannot be treated as a point mass, leading to the center of the ellipse being at the Earth's center.
  • A further explanation is provided regarding the effective mass of the Earth acting on the ball, which decreases as the ball approaches the center due to spherical symmetry.
  • One participant introduces a hypothetical scenario involving a body with Earth's mass and a small radius, questioning the behavior of the ball as it approaches the center and its subsequent trajectory.
  • Another participant challenges the modeling of the scenario, noting that the gravitational effect on the falling object changes with distance, which deviates from Keplerian assumptions of constant mass.
  • A participant expresses interest in understanding orbits with eccentricity close to one, describing a scenario with two particles under a common gravitational field and questioning the change in course of the orbiting particle at different distances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the orbit and the effects of gravity, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus on the correct interpretation of the scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions made regarding the mass distribution of the Earth, the treatment of gravitational forces at varying distances, and the applicability of Keplerian mechanics in the described scenarios.

luxtpm7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
You make a 100 m diameter tunnel that goes from the north pole to the south one.
You put into orbit a tennisball by dropping it in the tunnel from the north hemisphere
Supposing it makes an ellipse 99 m the minor axe and the Earth radius the bigger axe wouldn't the ball get into an orbit of eccentricity almost one which focus would be the center of the earth
Wouldnt this mean that a ball dropped from the north hemisphere would get such an orbit it would come out the northern hemisphere?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The ball would come out at both poles. You wouldn't get a standard eliptical orbit where the center of the main mass (in this case, The Earth) is located at one of the foci of the elipse, instead, it would be located at the center of the elipse. This is because, in this case, you cannot treat the entire Earth's mass as a point mass at its center.
 
Janus said:
in this case, you cannot treat the entire Earth's mass as a point mass at its center.

More specifically, when the ball is a distance r from the center of the earth, you can treat the mass of that part of the Earth that is inside radius r as a point mass at the center, and ignore the rest of the Earth. (assuming spherical symmetry)

Therefore, as the ball falls towards the center of the Earth, the "effective mass" of the Earth acting on it decreases.
 
Imagine a body with the Earth's mass and 1 cm radius you drop a ball10kmfromthenorth zenith of the body and make it an ellipse with a minor axe of 1 m and a bigger axe of 10km,an ellipse with an eccentricity of almost one

According to kepler the ball will orbit in an ellipse shape and the masive body will be at one of the focus of the ellipse

This means the ball will drop almost straight 10 km from the zenith of the north of the body will rise 10 cm in the south zenith and will return to the north zenith 10 km up and so on

My question is isn't gravity so odd it reverses the direction of the ball almost 180º when its a full speed? just like an ufo

How do Newtonian physics deal with this revers of sense at full speed?
 
luxtpm7 said:
How do Newtonian physics deal with this revers of sense at full speed?

Calculate the acceleration of the ball, produced by the gravitational force exerted on it by an earth-mass located at a distance of 1 m. That will give you a clue. :smile:
 
Imagine a body with the Earth's mass and 1 cm radius you drop a ball10km from the north zenith of the body and make it an ellipse with a minor axe of 1 m and a bigger axe of 10km,an ellipse with an eccentricity of almost one

This does not model the situation you have set up. Note that as mentioned in previous posts that the mass effecting the falling object changes with the radius, and is exactly zero when the falling body passes the center of the earth. This would not be a Keplerian orbit which assumes a constant mass as the attracting body.
 
My point is to understand orbits with an eccentricity close to one.

Lets take two particles under a common gravity field and with an orbit of eccentricity 0.999periodic.

If we consider one of the particles fixed, the fixed particle will be at the focus of an ellipse that will be almost a segment

The orbiting particle will almost perfectly fall and rebound up(trully it will be an allipse of eccentricity almost one)

my question is how is it possible the orbiting particle changes course almost 180º when its at a distance of 1 m of the other particle in the way down but changes almost 0º its course when its at a distance of the focus of 1.m in the way up(ellipses are symmetrical)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K