Orbital Angular Momenta - Conversion to a Different Origin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a second object relative to a different rotation center, specifically when the second object has a velocity relative to the first. It explores the scenario of a rotating sphere in a circular orbit, with its axis of rotation aligned with the plane of the orbit. The total angular momentum about the center of the circular orbit is derived using the relationship between the two rotation centers. The formulation includes terms that account for the contributions from both the angular momentum of the second object and the motion of the rotation center. Overall, the analysis provides insights into the complexities of angular momentum in multi-body systems.
MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71
Suppose we have some object with angular momenta \mathbf{L}_1 about rotation center O_1 and we have another object with angular momentum \mathbf{L}^\prime_2 about rotation center O_2. O_2 has some velocity \mathbf{v}_2 relative to O_1. Then we wonder what is the angular momentum of the second object with respect to O_1 so that we may express the total angular momentum of the system. Is there anything to say in general about this?

What about the case where the second object is a sphere, and it is rotating on its axis parallel to \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}_2, where \mathbf{r} is a vector from O_1 to O_2 ? For example consider a rotating sphere in a circular orbit, where the sphere's axis of rotation is parallel to the plane of the orbit. What is the total angular momentum about the center of the circular orbit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why this didn't occur to me until I took a shower.

\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{x}^\prime + \mathbf{O}_2



\mathbf{L}_2 = \sum m_i \mathbf{x}_i \times \dot{\mathbf{x}}_i = \sum m_i (\mathbf{x}_i^\prime + \mathbf{O}_2)\times \dot{\mathbf{x}}_i

= \sum m_i (\mathbf{x}_i^\prime + \mathbf{O}_2)\times \left(\dot{\mathbf{x}}^\prime_i + \dot{\mathbf{O}}_2\right)

=\mathbf{L}_2^\prime + \sum m_i \mathbf{O}_2 \times \dot{\mathbf{O}}_2 + \sum m_i \mathbf{x}_i^\prime \times \dot{\mathbf{O}}_2 + \sum m_i \mathbf{O}_2 \times \dot{\mathbf{x}}^\prime_i

So at least the first two terms have a nice form.

=\mathbf{L}_2^\prime + M_{total} \mathbf{O}_2 \times \dot{\mathbf{O}}_2 + \sum m_i \mathbf{x}_i^\prime \times \dot{\mathbf{O}}_2 + \sum m_i \mathbf{O}_2 \times \dot{\mathbf{x}}^\prime_i
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top