Orbital Effects of a Significant Mass Increase

AI Thread Summary
A significant mass increase of approximately 1.5 x 10^21 kg for Earth over five years would have minimal effects on its orbit around the Sun, as this mass change is negligible in the context of the Earth-sun system. The center of mass would barely shift, resulting in only minor alterations, such as slight changes in the length of the year. For the Earth-moon system, this mass increase represents only about 0.1% of Earth's total mass, leading to a similarly small change in gravitational force on the Moon. Consequently, the risk of a collision between the Moon and Earth due to increased gravity is extremely low. Overall, such a mass increase would not produce significant changes in either orbital system.
Johmpa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've recently been pondering the following thought experiment:

Assume that the Earth was to gain a large amount of mass in a very short time, which effectively increase the mass of the Earth by approx. 1.5 * 1021 kg, and this in course of say five years.

What I've been trying to figure out is what effect this would have on the Earths orbit around the Sun and, more interestingly, the Moons orbit around the Earth. Would this sudden increase result in an eventual collision between the Moon and Earth, given Earths increased gravity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For the earth-sun system, an increase on the order of 10^21 kg is almost nothing and barely shifts the center of mass of the system at all, so there would likely be no noticeable effects (small changes in the length of the year, perhaps).

As far as the earth-moon system is concerned, 10^21 kg is only ~.1% of the total mass of the Earth so the increase isn't that appreciable here either. Since gravity scales linearly with mass, this amounts to only a ~.1% change in gravitational force of the Earth on the moon, which likely will not cause any catastrophic effects.

Bottom line: 10^21 kg is not enough to produce huge changes in either of these systems.
 
Plug variable mass into Keplers Law and see what you get.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top