Orbital Mechanics Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the definitions of angular momentum in orbital motion, highlighting two interpretations: one involving radial velocity and the other involving tangential velocity. The first definition, h = r x r_dot, is questioned for its validity since r and r_dot are in the same direction, suggesting it may not accurately represent angular momentum. The correct expression for angular momentum is clarified as L = m r x v, where v is the velocity vector. The conversation concludes that the definitions can be context-dependent, but emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the terms involved in each formula. Understanding the relationship between position, velocity, and angular momentum is crucial in orbital mechanics.
FQVBSina_Jesse
Messages
54
Reaction score
9
Hello all,

I have a question regarding the precise definition of angular momentum in orbital motion.

I see one definition says angular momentum h, position, r, and radial velocity, r_dot, are related as follows:
h = r x r_dot.

However, I also see one definition that says h is related to r and tangential velocity as follows:
h = r2θ_dot = r* (r*θ_dot)
Where θ_dot is the angular velocity, which makes rθ_dot the tangential velocity.

How come both definitions can be correct at times?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tnich said:
I don't think your first definition makes sense. ##\vec r \times \vec {\dot r} = 0## since ##\vec r## and ##\vec {\dot r}## are in the same direction.
What would make sense is angular momentum ##\vec L =m \vec r \times \vec v##.
It is exactly as written in the book.
Actually, I just figured it out...
In an orbit, the r is defined from the center of the inertial frame. So r2 is rotated from r1 but the root of the vector is still at the inertial center. That means delta_r is a tangential vector that connects r1's vector head to r2's vector head. Making r_dot actually in the direction of the angular velocity.
 
FQVBSina said:
I see one definition says angular momentum h, position, r, and radial velocity, r_dot, are related as follows:
h = r x r_dot.
You may want to check the source of this definition a little more carefully. Here ##r## should be position and ##\dot{r}## should be velocity (not radial velocity) and the expression should be ##r \times m \dot{r}##
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top