Orbital Mechanics: Find Eqns of Motion w/ Initial Conditions

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the position of an orbiting body is complex, and there is no universal method for all scenarios. The discussion centers on the two-body problem, which involves determining the equations of motion for a satellite based on its initial tangential velocity, distance from the central mass, and its mass. Ignoring the satellite's mass simplifies the calculation, allowing for the rotation rate to be derived easily. For more accurate results, both masses and the center-to-center distance are necessary. The provided document may assist in deriving the required equations for specific cases.
Timothy S
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hello,

After searching on the internet, I have come to the conclusion that there is no completely general way to calculate the position of an orbiting body. My question is whether there is a way to find the equations of motion with respect to time of a satellite orbit given only the initial tangential velocity, distance from the central mass, and mass of the satellite. If there is, I would appreciate a derivation of the equation.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you are looking for paticular object?
 
If you ignore the mass of the satellite, its easy, its rotation rate = v / r (radians per second)

If you had the mass of the orbited body:
Using the attached word document, given both masses, and the centre to centre distance, you can derive what you need, if not you may get some mileage from it anyway.
 

Attachments

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top