Exploring Orbital Velocity: Significance and Applications

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of orbital velocity in relation to the speed of light and its mathematical implications. The user explores the boundary where orbital velocity equals the speed of light, deriving a formula that resembles the Schwarzschild radius. It is clarified that this boundary does not hold significance outside of Newtonian mechanics, as general relativity (GR) provides a more accurate framework for understanding such phenomena. The conversation highlights that Newtonian mechanics is a first-order approximation that breaks down under extreme conditions, necessitating the use of GR for accurate predictions. Ultimately, the photon sphere is identified as the relevant boundary for light orbiting a black hole, located outside the event horizon.
travwg33
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am fairly new to astronomy, having just finished a course this past semester in high school, and I have a question about orbital velocity.

Now, I know that the event horizon is the boundary at which the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, but is there any significance to the boundary at which the orbital velocity is equal to the speed of light?

I quickly messed around with the math to see where such a boundary would lie and determined this:
Vorb = √((Gm)/r)

substitute Vorb for C

C = √((Gm)/r)
r = (Gm)/(C2)

This is obviously very similar to determining the Schwarzschild radius and this boudary would actually be inside the event horizon, light orbiting the singularity, but never moving out past the radius once in orbit.

I looked online to see if such a boundary was important or existed and I think I found something similar the photon sphere, but the equation is different and this sphere is outside the event horizon.

Does the boundary where r = (Gm)/(C2) mean anything?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Does the boundary where r = (Gm)/(C2) mean anything?
No. It's a coincidence that a Newtonian calculation gives the correct result for the Schwarzschild radius (he's not a child, btw). You can't expect that it works for other qunatities.
If you do the calculations in GR, you get the photon sphere result. For illustration, think that the centrifugal force reverses direction near the horizon, where relativity becomes important. Thus, it's even harder to orbit than to escape.
 
Ah ok that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying that up :)
 
Just thinking, I do not know too much about Newtonian mechanics or GR, but does this mean that NM breaks down under extreme conditions?
 
Exactly. It works if you have small velocities and weak gravity. It's like a first order approximation to the exact GR laws.
You can make it work more exactly or for more extreme circumstances if you include some corrections, like a second order approximation to GR. That's called the Post-Newtonian formalism.
Under the most extreme conditions, you use full GR.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top