Orchestration of Quantum Entanglement

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the orchestration of quantum entanglement, exploring its nature and potential explanations. Participants consider theoretical frameworks, including the implications of extra dimensions and the relationship between entangled particles across distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether quantum entanglement requires a deeper, non-spatial level of existence where distance is irrelevant.
  • Another participant suggests that entanglement may not involve information transfer, proposing that entangled states are simply equal to each other, akin to a mathematical truth.
  • Some participants propose that entangled particles might occupy the same 5-dimensional space while being located in different 3-dimensional spaces.
  • A participant draws an analogy of folding a piece of paper to illustrate how points may touch in a higher-dimensional space.
  • Concerns are raised about the exaggeration of claims regarding the implications of higher dimensions on the human brain's information processing.
  • One participant challenges the validity of claims that extend beyond established scientific consensus, likening them to string theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of quantum entanglement and its explanations, with no consensus reached on the validity of the proposed models or analogies.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about higher dimensions and their implications, which remain unresolved within the discussion. The relationship between quantum entanglement and information transfer is also debated without clear conclusions.

tim1608
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
How and where is quantum entanglement orchestrated? Does it require a deeper, non-spacial level of existence where the distance between entangled particles is irrelevant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple ways to explain it. One is that there isn't really information being sent over those distances, that the reason it happens is simply because two states are just equal to each other. If I say 1=x+2, then time doesn't need to pass in order for that statement to be true, it's just mathematically true.
The other explanation is there are extra dimensions, and entangled particles occupy the same 5 dimensional space but different locations in 3 dimensional space.
 
questionpost said:
The other explanation is there are extra dimensions, and entangled particles occupy the same 5 dimensional space but different locations in 3 dimensional space.

Is this like folding a piece of paper in such a way that two or more points on the piece of paper are touching each other?

Is it possible that a 5-dimensional representation of the human brain would reveal a very sharp focal point for all of the brain's information?
 
tim1608 said:
Is this like folding a piece of paper in such a way that two or more points on the piece of paper are touching each other?

Is it possible that a 5-dimensional representation of the human brain would reveal a very sharp focal point for all of the brain's information?

Probably not. A lot of what your saying is over-exaggerated.
 
questionpost said:
Probably not. A lot of what your saying is over-exaggerated.

Please explain.
 
questionpost said:
Probably not. A lot of what your saying is over-exaggerated.

Do you disagree with Penrose and Hameroff?
 
tim1608 said:
Please explain.

Anything beyond "the probability mathematically correlates no matter what the distance" has not been scientifically credited. What your saying might as well be string-theory.
 

Similar threads

High School Trivial quantum entanglement question (from a rookie)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
418
Graduate Could there be a "Communication Theorem" instead of a "No-Communication Theorem" in quantum entanglement?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School Quantum Entanglement in Practice
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Why is entanglement necessary in a quantum computer?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Quantum Entanglement and Synchronization
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
High School Quantum Entanglement & Hybridization
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad How Do You Break Quantum Entanglement Bonds?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Undergrad Entanglement swapping in the context of Indivisible Stochastic Process
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Undergrad Quantum Entanglement and Parallel Worlds/Existence
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K