Order of anharmonicity of a simple pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the anharmonicity of a simple pendulum, specifically regarding the potential energy expansion. The potential energy is expressed as V=mgl(θ²/2 - θ⁴/24 + ...), leading to the conclusion that the order of anharmonicity is θ⁴. Participants clarify that the question pertains to potential rather than force, emphasizing that the potential is symmetric and lacks odd terms in its expansion. This distinction is crucial for accurately addressing the order of anharmonicity in the context of the pendulum's potential. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of focusing on the specified potential.
Saptarshi Sarkar
Messages
98
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
The anharmonicity in the potential of a simple pendulum is of the order of

1. ##\theta##
2. ##\theta^2##
3. ##\theta^3##
4. ##\theta^4##
Relevant Equations
##V=mgl(1-cos\theta)##
I know that the potential of a simple pendulum is given by the above formula and that we can expand ##cos\theta## to get

##V=mgl\left(\frac{\theta^2}{2}-\frac{\theta^4}{24}+...\right )##

I am guessing that the answer is ##\theta^4##, but I am not sure what "order" means here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be my guess too.
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
It seems at least as valid to say that the standard harmonic equation is ##\ddot x=-k^2x##, but the pendulum is ##\ddot x=-k^2\sin(x)=-k^2x+O(x^3)##, so the anharmonicity is ##O(x^3)##.
 
haruspex said:
It seems at least as valid to say that the standard harmonic equation is ##\ddot x=-k^2x##, but the pendulum is ##\ddot x=-k^2\sin(x)=-k^2x+O(x^3)##, so the anharmonicity is ##O(x^3)##.
Yes, but that is the anharmonicity in the force not the potential which is what the question asks. The potential is symmetric about the equilibrium position and has no odd terms in its expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex
kuruman said:
Yes, but that is the anharmonicity in the force not the potential which is what the question asks. The potential is symmetric about the equilibrium position and has no odd terms in its expansion.
Thanks, I missed that it specified potential.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top