Confirming the Nomenclature of C(triplebond)C-CH2-CH3

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeahomgrajan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature
AI Thread Summary
The compound C(triplebond)C-CH2-CH3 is correctly named 1-butyne, as the term "butyne" alone is ambiguous and could refer to either 1-butyne or 2-butyne. For hexene, it is generally assumed to be 1-hexene unless specified otherwise, with the double bond's position indicated only when it is not at the first carbon. The discussion emphasizes that only numbers greater than 1 are used to denote the location of double and triple bonds. It is recommended to use the prefix "1-" to avoid ambiguity in nomenclature. Clarity in chemical naming is crucial to prevent miscommunication in chemical reactions.
jeahomgrajan
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
This is a question which i just want to make sure of..

C(triplebond)C-CH2-CH3

so this would be called butyne
but can it also be called 1-butyne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
H-C(triplebond)C-CH2-CH3

is 1-butyne. The name butyne is ambiguous because it could refer to 1-butyne or 2-butyne (see below), which are different molecules.

CH3-C(triplebond)C-CH3
 
alright suppose i was given hexene and i was told to draw it, i would assume the double bond is at 1, right
 
jeahomgrajan said:
alright suppose i was given hexene and i was told to draw it, i would assume the double bond is at 1, right

Yes Right, hexene means 1-hexene and the double bond either on the right or on the left of the structure { C(d.bond)CH2...etc) or (CH3...etc...C(d.bond) }
Only numbers over 1 are given to determine the location of the double and the triple bonds.
 
thanks
 
Silex7 said:
Only numbers over 1 are given to determine the location of the double and the triple bonds.

That's only a convention, and not a widely spread one. Whenever there is a risk of ambiguity, go for 1-somethingene, as it is much cheaper to add 1- each time on paper then to use incorrent reagent once.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top