Organic Chemistry: Aromatic Compounds

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a request for a clearer title for a thread on aromatic compounds in organic chemistry. The original poster expresses frustration over a lack of responses, suggesting the title may be the issue. A participant advises patience, indicating that replies may take longer than expected. The title is subsequently changed to better reflect the topic. Additionally, specific feedback is provided on questions related to Friedel-Crafts acylation and the importance of resonance in aromatic chemistry.
UNknown 2010
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Is there any mistake ?

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7462/90558873jn1.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


I think the title of the topic is not clear so that I did not receive any reply.

Please, change it to a suitable title.
 


UNknown 2010 said:
I think the title of the topic is not clear so that I did not receive any reply.

Please, change it to a suitable title.
I think that you may have to wait a little longer than three hours to get a response, as I've said before, please be patient.

I've changed the title of the thread to something more appropriate. Next time I suggest you chose your title more careful when you originally post the thread.
 
UNknown 2010 said:
Hello,

Is there any mistake ?

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/7462/90558873jn1.png

Yes for question number one.


http://blog.para-gen.com/2008/07/141/friedel-crafts-acylation.html

For question number two you may want to mention resonance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top