Organizing Your Physics Calculations: Tips and Examples

AI Thread Summary
Organizing physics calculations can enhance clarity and presentation. A common approach includes starting with a problem statement and relevant diagrams, followed by listing known values and equations. The calculation process typically involves detailed mathematical steps leading to a clearly marked solution. While strict formatting is not always required, some instructors may specify preferences, such as presenting the final answer in a complete sentence. Overall, maintaining a structured format can improve the readability of assignments without risking marks for presentation.
annalise17
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This doesn't really go in the format for this section but I don't think it fits anywhere else...

Does anyone have examples of how they write up their solution to problems? I have one based around special relativity and I want to keep everything in a nice order so I wondered if anyone had anything a little more organised than my scribbles!

Mine is basically:

Diagram
Known Values
Equation
Where x is... etc.
Rearranging for x gives:
Substituting the known values gives:
Answer
Summary: Therefore the value of x is... (? sf)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless your prof explicitly states that he/she wants it in a specific format then it really doesn't matter. My assignments usually consist of:

Problem statement (what are we trying to find/prove and any diagrams)
Relevant equations (sometimes numbered so I can refer back to them)
math
math
math
math
math
solution (Circled and with arrows to it so the TA knows what the final answer is)

Usually it doesn't follow any strict guidelines. I have never been docked marks for messiness.

Edit - I had one class where the prof explicitly stated that she wanted the final answer in a sentence and 'boxed' at the end. That was the only time I've ever been given 'guidance' towards how to format my assignments.
 
Thanks :) I haven't written relevant equations at the start before so I might just do that now to neaten things up :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top