Oribtal and rotational velocities

  • Thread starter Thread starter mun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
Orbital velocity and rotational velocity are often used interchangeably in discussions about celestial bodies, but they can refer to different concepts. Orbital velocity pertains to individual stars or objects in orbit, while rotational velocity typically describes the motion of a galaxy as a whole. The term 'projected rotational velocity' incorporates the sine function to account for the angle of observation, affecting how velocities are measured, particularly through Doppler shifts. This distinction is crucial in astronomy, as it influences how we interpret the motion of celestial objects. Understanding these terms helps clarify discussions about galaxy dynamics and star movements.
mun
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi

Is "orbital velocity" supposed to be the same as "rotational velocity"? it seems that a "rotation curve" is supposed to plot the rotational velocity of a star, but then some articles e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_problem claim "orbital speed" is plotted.

The equation for rotational velocity seems to be in the shape of V sin(i) but the equation for orbital velocity doesn't depend on sin.

Any help will be much appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There may be some terminology confusion. Orbital speed refers to individual stars, while rotational velocity refers to the galaxy as a whole.
 
Hi Mun

I am not sure that there actually is a particularly rigidly defined set of definitions for these terms and I find that they are often used to mean different things. In my experience, 'orbital velocity' and 'rotational velocity' generally mean the same thing when you are discussing an object orbiting another body, i.e. the Earth around the sun, or the sun around the centre of a galaxy. In this case, both terms usually refer to the actual velocities of the orbiting objects, and not the angular velocities (though I suspect it may rarely be used this way).

The term 'rotational velocity' is used in a lot more situations, and usually refers to the velocity of a thing that is rotating around some point. For instance, you may be looking at a frisbee that is spinning: the rotational velocity of some point on that frisbee is its actual velocity.

I do not know where the sin i term comes into all this, but I suspect it has to do with what is normally called 'projected rotational velocity'. That is the component on the rotational velocity in the direction towards or away from us (i.e. in the 'radial direction') and is given by vsini, where v is the actual rotational velocity of the object in question, and i is the angle between our line-of-sight, and the axis around which the object is rotating. For instance, consider the spinning frisbee again. If you look down on the frisbee from above, such that it looks like a circle, the i in vsini is going to be zero, and so the projected rotational velocity of each point on the frisbee is zero, corresponding to the fact that no point on the frisbee is moving towards you or away from you. If you look at the frisbee edge on, such that is looks more or less like a line, i will be 90 degrees, and so vsini with equal v.

This is important in astronomy since the velocities of objects are often measures using Doppler shift, which really measures the 'radial velocity'.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top