Orientation distribution function

pathfinder
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
i have a problem that i wanted to share with you
if we consider a polycrystal made of cylindrical fibers following a von mises-fisher distribution equation (17) in http://bit.do/vmisesfisher (called orientation distribution function of fibers) . i must change the probability density in equation (28) http://bit.do/e28 with the von mises-fisher than i must follow the steps listed in the article http://bit.do/effectivetensor1 , http://bit.do/effectivetensor2 , http://bit.do/effectivetensor3 so that by using orientation averaging, i find the effective (elasticity) tensor of the polycrystal
it s an optimization problem
arg min of the integral over rotation group of the von mises-fisher distribution multiplied by the distance between the effective tensor of the polycrystal (what we are looking for) and the one of a single cylindrical fiber (given).

if anyone could give ideas about how can i start solving this optimization problem to find the effective tensor of the polycrystal
.
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your links produce warnings about a malicious web site. I suggest you give ordinary links instead of those from bit.do.
 
sorry Stephen i changed the links

i have a problem that i wanted to share with you
if we consider a polycrystal made of cylindrical fibers following a von mises-fisher distribution equation (17) in http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=786125Photo005.jpg (called orientation distribution function of fibers) . i must change the probability density in equation (28) http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=235923Photo.jpg with the von mises-fisher than i must follow the steps listed in the article http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=555305Photo001.jpg , http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=275307Photo002.jpg , http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=664133Photo003.jpg so that by using orientation averaging, i find the effective (elasticity) tensor of the polycrystal
it s an optimization problem
arg min of the integral over rotation group of the von mises-fisher distribution multiplied by the distance between the effective tensor of the polycrystal (what we are looking for) and the one of a single cylindrical fiber (given).

if anyone could give ideas about how can i start solving this optimization problem to find the effective tensor of the polycrystal
.
thank you
 
I know nothing about this complicated looking problem. I'd be glad to discuss it with you. That will keep the thread alive while you can explain it to me! - and perhaps someone who knows the answer will chime in.

A fundamental question is "What do you consider a solution?" Even before defining whether a solution is a number, a function, a set, animal, vegetable or mineral, we have the question of how specifically it needs to be expressed.

The general problem (I think) is to find argmin...of something. A completely theoretical solution is: argmin ...of the thing = some function or expression expressed abstractly in terms of the variables in the problem. A completely numerical solution is a computer algorithm that produces a big file of numbers. in between these extremes you could have a solution that says if we consider a family of functions defined by some parameters then the answer is approximated by solving a certain system of equations where these parameters are the unknowns - and maybe you have use a computer algorithm to solve the equations numerically.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top