Orthogonality of Legendre Polynomials from Jackson

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of Legendre Polynomials from Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, specifically focusing on an integration by parts step in the proof. The user struggles with understanding how Jackson transitions from an orthogonality statement to a subsequent equation. Through clarification, it is explained that integration by parts can be applied, leading to a zero result for the boundary term. The user ultimately experiences an "aha!" moment, realizing their misunderstanding and expressing gratitude for the assistance. The conversation highlights the importance of integration techniques in mathematical proofs.
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
Hello all!

I am trying to work through and understand the derivation of the Legendre Polynomials from Jackson's Classical electrodynamics. I have reached a part that I cannot get through however. Jackson starts with the following orthogonality statement and jumps (as it seems) in his proof:

Equation 3.17 states:

\int P_{l'}[\frac{d}{dx} ([1-x^{2}]\frac{dP_{l}}{dx})+l(l+1)P_{l}(x)]dx=0

He mentions integration by parts on the "first term" but I don't see how he gets to

Equation 3.18:

\int [(x^{2}-1)\frac{dP_{l}}{dx} \frac{dP_{l'}}{dx} +l(l+1)(P_{l'}(x)P_{l}(x))]dx=0

I don't see this. Could someone please explain or give a hint to the intermediate step here? I'm afraid I just do not see it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You understand integration by parts, yes? To wit,

\int udv = uv-\int vdu

So by the chain rule we can also say

\int u \frac{dv}{dx}dx = uv-\int v \frac{du}{dx}dx

So it is easy to see that u=P_{\ell'} and v=\left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right]. In this manner we arrive at

\int_{-1}^1 P_{\ell'} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] dx = \left. P_{\ell'} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \right|^{x=1}_{x=-1} - \int_{-1}^1 \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \frac{d P_{\ell'}}{dx} dx

The first term works out to be zero obviously and thus we say that,

\int_{-1}^1 P_{\ell'} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] dx = \int_{-1}^1 \left[ \left(x^2-1\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \frac{d P_{\ell'}}{dx} dx
 
Born2bwire said:
You understand integration by parts, yes? To wit,

\int udv = uv-\int vdu

So by the chain rule we can also say

\int u \frac{dv}{dx}dx = uv-\int v \frac{du}{dx}dx

So it is easy to see that u=P_{\ell'} and v=\left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right]. In this manner we arrive at

\int_{-1}^1 P_{\ell'} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] dx = \left. P_{\ell'} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \right|^{x=1}_{x=-1} - \int_{-1}^1 \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \frac{d P_{\ell'}}{dx} dx

The first term works out to be zero obviously and thus we say that,

\int_{-1}^1 P_{\ell'} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ \left(1-x^2\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] dx = \int_{-1}^1 \left[ \left(x^2-1\right)\frac{dP_\ell}{dx}\right] \frac{d P_{\ell'}}{dx} dx

Of course I understand Integration by parts, and in fact I just barely started it myself so this whole conversation is null. Thank you for your time, but I just had an aha! moment :) Sorry about that.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top